Cultivated fish (CF), produced through cellular agriculture, is emerging as a potential alternative to conventional fisheries and aquaculture. Yet, consumer acceptance of this product remains uncertain. This scoping review synthesizes peer-reviewed literature published since 2018 (n = 11 studies) on attitudes toward CF. Findings show that perceptions are shaped by expected product attributes (safety, health, taste, sustainability), self-reported intentions (willingness to try, buy, or pay a premium price), and individual factors (age, education, food neophobia, familiarity). Safety concerns and negative reactions to technical naming (e.g., “cell-cultured”) act as major barriers, while environmental and ethical benefits are viewed positively but do not always translate into purchase intention. The review highlights the need for targeted marketing strategies, appropriate naming, and regulatory clarity to foster consumers’ trust and support market development.

Consumer acceptance of cultivated fish:a scoping review / A.F. Corradini, E. Demartini, C.M. Moresino, M.E. Marescotti, A. Gaviglio, D. Lanzoni, C. Giromini. - In: DISCOVER FOOD. - ISSN 2731-4286. - 6:(2026 Jan 29), pp. 58.1-58.22. [10.1007/s44187-026-00805-3]

Consumer acceptance of cultivated fish:a scoping review

A.F. Corradini
Primo
;
E. Demartini
Secondo
;
C.M. Moresino;M.E. Marescotti;A. Gaviglio;D. Lanzoni
Penultimo
;
C. Giromini
Ultimo
2026

Abstract

Cultivated fish (CF), produced through cellular agriculture, is emerging as a potential alternative to conventional fisheries and aquaculture. Yet, consumer acceptance of this product remains uncertain. This scoping review synthesizes peer-reviewed literature published since 2018 (n = 11 studies) on attitudes toward CF. Findings show that perceptions are shaped by expected product attributes (safety, health, taste, sustainability), self-reported intentions (willingness to try, buy, or pay a premium price), and individual factors (age, education, food neophobia, familiarity). Safety concerns and negative reactions to technical naming (e.g., “cell-cultured”) act as major barriers, while environmental and ethical benefits are viewed positively but do not always translate into purchase intention. The review highlights the need for targeted marketing strategies, appropriate naming, and regulatory clarity to foster consumers’ trust and support market development.
Cultivated fish; Cell-based seafood; Lab-grown fish; Consumer acceptance; Consumer perception; Alternative proteins; Sustainable food system
Settore AGRI-01/A - Economia agraria, alimentare ed estimo rurale
Settore AGRI-09/B - Nutrizione e alimentazione animale
   Cellular agriculture for sustainable and innovative food production- CELLtoFOOD
   CELLtoFOOD
   MINISTERO DELL'UNIVERSITA' E DELLA RICERCA
   20229S4T77_001
29-gen-2026
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s44187-026-00805-3.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.41 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.41 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1214479
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact