In this paper we present philosophical methods and perspectives that we designed to improve extant food ontologies or to develop future ones. The scope of our inquiry covers the space where folk food ontologies inspired by common sense interact with scientific ones in shaping individual and collective representation of the food domain and in which the defectiveness of food concepts-i.e., their failure in providing proper representations-reveals a plural, sometimes conflicting, ontological layout. To solve such conflicts and clarify those representations, we build conceptual frameworks that extend (and sometimes also revise) everyday usage and practices. Food ontology, in this sense, should be understood as the study of everyday, legal, and scientific taxonomies and more or less formal classificatory practices, in order to facilitate the negotiation among different positions. In this paper we show our approach to conceptual clarification of the food domain by offering three examples of philosophical analysis, placed at different levels of generality: "what is food?"; the four dimensions of food concepts; the analysis of "eating local.".

From Philosophy to Ontology: Rethinking Food Concepts / A. Borghini, N. Piras, B. Serini (CEUR WORKSHOP PROCEEDINGS). - In: JOWO Joint Ontology Workshops Episode VII[s.l] : CEUR-WS, 2021. (( Intervento presentato al 12. convegno The Bolzano Summer of Knowledge co-located with the International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS 2021), and the International Conference on Biomedical Ontologies (ICBO 2021) : September, 11th through 18th tenutosi a Bolzano nel 2021.

From Philosophy to Ontology: Rethinking Food Concepts

A. Borghini
Primo
;
N. Piras
Penultimo
;
B. Serini
Ultimo
2021

Abstract

In this paper we present philosophical methods and perspectives that we designed to improve extant food ontologies or to develop future ones. The scope of our inquiry covers the space where folk food ontologies inspired by common sense interact with scientific ones in shaping individual and collective representation of the food domain and in which the defectiveness of food concepts-i.e., their failure in providing proper representations-reveals a plural, sometimes conflicting, ontological layout. To solve such conflicts and clarify those representations, we build conceptual frameworks that extend (and sometimes also revise) everyday usage and practices. Food ontology, in this sense, should be understood as the study of everyday, legal, and scientific taxonomies and more or less formal classificatory practices, in order to facilitate the negotiation among different positions. In this paper we show our approach to conceptual clarification of the food domain by offering three examples of philosophical analysis, placed at different levels of generality: "what is food?"; the four dimensions of food concepts; the analysis of "eating local.".
Conceptual maps; Culinary Mind; Food ontology; Philosophy;
Settore M-FIL/01 - Filosofia Teoretica
Settore M-FIL/05 - Filosofia e Teoria dei Linguaggi
   Dipartimenti di Eccellenza 2018-2022 - Dipartimento di FILOSOFIA
   MINISTERO DELL'ISTRUZIONE E DEL MERITO
2021
Book Part (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
paper6-IFOW.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 576.13 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
576.13 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/897444
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact