Background/Objectives: Lifestyle Modification Programs (LMPs) based on exercise and nutrition aim to prevent/manage chronic diseases and foster well-being. However, moving LMPs from research to medical practice can be challenging, as programs must be both effective and feasible. The primary goal of this study was to assess cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) changes according to an LMP, measured through VO2max, as a key indicator of health outcomes and intervention efficacy. Methods: In this single-arm intervention study, 100 subjects were enrolled; per-protocol analysis of main parameters was performed on 85 participants (15 were excluded due to medical/technical reasons). A feasible intervention program (of low resource intensity with only two physician/patient encounters) provided personalized exercise prescription, optimized nutritional habits based on the Mediterranean diet and Healthy Eating Plate principles, and supported behaviour change. We assessed CRF through VO2max, a key indicator of health outcomes and intervention efficacy. We also analyzed, using regression analysis, the relationship between VO2max (the gold-standard measure of CRF) and METSpeak, a simpler, feasible parameter of CRF derived from Exercise Stress Testing. Body composition (BC) and AHA diet score were also measured at baseline and post-6-month intervention. Statistical analyses included paired comparisons and multivariable regression to explore factors influencing CRF changes. Results: Analysis on the primary outcome, VO2max, was performed according to the intention-to-treat principle and per-protocol. This feasible protocol resulted in a significant increase in VO2max, improvements in fat-free mass, and a reduction in fat mass. Overall, 42.4% of participants achieved an improvement of ≥1 MET, a change previously associated with reduced mortality risk. Older participants tend to experience smaller improvements in VO2max. Conclusions: Although observing an improvement in CRF and BC following an LMP is not surprising, the strength of the study is to show the feasibility of implementing an effective, feasible LMP into clinical routine, supporting the integration of such programs into clinical practice.
Main outcomes of the HEBE trial: improving cardiorespiratory fitness and body composition through a tailored feasible lifestyle program / D. Lucini, F.R.. - In: NUTRIENTS. - ISSN 2072-6643. - 18:12(2026 Jun 12), pp. 1918.1-1918.28. [10.3390/nu18121918]
Main outcomes of the HEBE trial: improving cardiorespiratory fitness and body composition through a tailored feasible lifestyle program
D. Lucini
Primo
;F. RotaSecondo
;G. Marano;G. Oggionni;E. Luconi;S. Iodice;F. Bianchi;C. Mando’;G. Bernardelli;M. Malacarne;S. Castaldi;P. Boracchi;V. BollatiPenultimo
;M. ClericiCo-ultimo
;E. BiganzoliCo-ultimo
;F. AmbrogiMembro del Collaboration Group
;B. ArosioMembro del Collaboration Group
;M. AureliMembro del Collaboration Group
;G. BaronMembro del Collaboration Group
;M. BaruscottiMembro del Collaboration Group
;C. BattagliaMembro del Collaboration Group
;C. BellocchiMembro del Collaboration Group
;S. BellostaMembro del Collaboration Group
;C. BernardelliMembro del Collaboration Group
;M. BonomiMembro del Collaboration Group
;F. BraviMembro del Collaboration Group
;P. BroccaMembro del Collaboration Group
;A. BrucatoMembro del Collaboration Group
;A. BucchiMembro del Collaboration Group
;M. CameraMembro del Collaboration Group
;N. CaporaleMembro del Collaboration Group
;G. CappellettiMembro del Collaboration Group
;A. CarettiMembro del Collaboration Group
;L. CasatiMembro del Collaboration Group
;S. CastaldiMembro del Collaboration Group
;S. CastiglioniMembro del Collaboration Group
;M.G. CattaneoMembro del Collaboration Group
;R. CazzolaMembro del Collaboration Group
;S. CentanniMembro del Collaboration Group
;I. CetinMembro del Collaboration Group
;R. ChiaramonteMembro del Collaboration Group
;I. ChiodiniMembro del Collaboration Group
;E. ChiricozziMembro del Collaboration Group
;P. CianaMembro del Collaboration Group
;V. CitroMembro del Collaboration Group
;M.S. ClericiMembro del Collaboration Group
;C.B. CogliatiMembro del Collaboration Group
;S.L. CorbettaMembro del Collaboration Group
;F. D’AddioMembro del Collaboration Group
;A. D’AmatoMembro del Collaboration Group
;C.M.L. DallanoceMembro del Collaboration Group
;M.V. Dei CasMembro del Collaboration Group
;E. Del FaveroMembro del Collaboration Group
;A. Delle FaveMembro del Collaboration Group
;G. Dias RodriguesMembro del Collaboration Group
;E. DozioMembro del Collaboration Group
;V. EdefontiMembro del Collaboration Group
;C. FeniziaMembro del Collaboration Group
;L. FerrariMembro del Collaboration Group
;M. FerraroniMembro del Collaboration Group
;P. FiorinaMembro del Collaboration Group
;D.M.M. FornasariMembro del Collaboration Group
;M. FumagalliMembro del Collaboration Group
;N. GaglianoMembro del Collaboration Group
;E.R. GallieraMembro del Collaboration Group
;J.A.E. GeginatMembro del Collaboration Group
;D. GiannandreaMembro del Collaboration Group
;F. IngegnoliMembro del Collaboration Group
;C.A.M. La PortaMembro del Collaboration Group
;C.V.B. La VecchiaMembro del Collaboration Group
;D. LeccaMembro del Collaboration Group
;E.A. LesmaMembro del Collaboration Group
;P. LimontaMembro del Collaboration Group
;C. LoretelliMembro del Collaboration Group
;D. LuciniMembro del Collaboration Group
;V. MartiniMembro del Collaboration Group
;C. MateraMembro del Collaboration Group
;N. MontanoMembro del Collaboration Group
;L. PantoniMembro del Collaboration Group
;N. PapiniMembro del Collaboration Group
;R.C. ParoniMembro del Collaboration Group
;C. PeregoMembro del Collaboration Group
;L. PersaniMembro del Collaboration Group
;A. PistocchiMembro del Collaboration Group
;N. PlatonovaMembro del Collaboration Group
;G. PoddaMembro del Collaboration Group
;P.T. Rise'Membro del Collaboration Group
;P.V. RivaMembro del Collaboration Group
;A.M. RizzoMembro del Collaboration Group
;V.M. RondelliMembro del Collaboration Group
;M. RossiMembro del Collaboration Group
;F. RotaMembro del Collaboration Group
;M. RuscicaMembro del Collaboration Group
;V.M. SavasiMembro del Collaboration Group
;M. ScavoneMembro del Collaboration Group
;L. SfondriniMembro del Collaboration Group
;L. SironiMembro del Collaboration Group
;M. SommarivaMembro del Collaboration Group
;G. TestaMembro del Collaboration Group
;E. TobaldiniMembro del Collaboration Group
;C.A. TringaliMembro del Collaboration Group
;E. VerduciMembro del Collaboration Group
;M. VicenziMembro del Collaboration Group
;C.A. Vigano'Membro del Collaboration Group
;G. VistoliMembro del Collaboration Group
;G. VitaleMembro del Collaboration Group
2026
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Lifestyle Modification Programs (LMPs) based on exercise and nutrition aim to prevent/manage chronic diseases and foster well-being. However, moving LMPs from research to medical practice can be challenging, as programs must be both effective and feasible. The primary goal of this study was to assess cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) changes according to an LMP, measured through VO2max, as a key indicator of health outcomes and intervention efficacy. Methods: In this single-arm intervention study, 100 subjects were enrolled; per-protocol analysis of main parameters was performed on 85 participants (15 were excluded due to medical/technical reasons). A feasible intervention program (of low resource intensity with only two physician/patient encounters) provided personalized exercise prescription, optimized nutritional habits based on the Mediterranean diet and Healthy Eating Plate principles, and supported behaviour change. We assessed CRF through VO2max, a key indicator of health outcomes and intervention efficacy. We also analyzed, using regression analysis, the relationship between VO2max (the gold-standard measure of CRF) and METSpeak, a simpler, feasible parameter of CRF derived from Exercise Stress Testing. Body composition (BC) and AHA diet score were also measured at baseline and post-6-month intervention. Statistical analyses included paired comparisons and multivariable regression to explore factors influencing CRF changes. Results: Analysis on the primary outcome, VO2max, was performed according to the intention-to-treat principle and per-protocol. This feasible protocol resulted in a significant increase in VO2max, improvements in fat-free mass, and a reduction in fat mass. Overall, 42.4% of participants achieved an improvement of ≥1 MET, a change previously associated with reduced mortality risk. Older participants tend to experience smaller improvements in VO2max. Conclusions: Although observing an improvement in CRF and BC following an LMP is not surprising, the strength of the study is to show the feasibility of implementing an effective, feasible LMP into clinical routine, supporting the integration of such programs into clinical practice.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
26_Main Outcomes of the HEBE Trial Improving Cardiorespiratory.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.52 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.52 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




