Light is a crucial mediator in plants of growth and development, secondary metabolism, and signaling of potentially beneficial phytochemicals. The present study investigated three indoor supplemental light treatments, HPS, LED, and LED+IR, applied during tomato cultivation, in which non-destructive and destructive analyses were performed at two time points to record the physiological responses and effects of these artificial lights on the growth and quality of the produce. An infrared thermometer and thermal cameras were used throughout the experiment to record temperature changes under each growing condition. LED+IR supplemented light showed a decrease in photosynthetic pigments, such as chlorophyll a, b, and carotenoids but induced an increased number of flowers, heavier tomato fruits, enhanced anthocyanins, phenolic index, lipid peroxidation, titratable acidity, and reduced nitrate accumulation. Moreover, higher generated temperatures under LED+IR helped tomato plants to reduce white fly infestation, but suppressed plant height. HPS light performed better than both LED and LED+IR in terms of total sugar accumulation, total carotenoids, water content, plant height, and leaf lipid peroxidation at harvest. Lycopene, ß-carotene, brix index were remarkable under HPS lighting but under the same conditions the number of whiteflies, however, was the highest in HPS among all the tested light treatments. In terms of fruit color analysis, maximum redness (a*), reduced hue angle, and chroma were observed under LED+IR while LED lighting in brightness (L*), and HPS in yellowness (b*) were prominent. However, LED in particular was insufficiently effective in acquiring any possible physiological and qualitative characteristics of tomato plants and fruits for the observed time span of the experiment. Hence, LED+IR has been shown to boost the accumulation of bioactive chemicals, improve fruit quality, promote more rapid and early flowering in tomato plants, and can serve as an efficient replacement for traditional indoor illumination.

Quality and physiological evaluation of tomato subjected to different supplemental lighting systems / A. Ali, V. Cavallaro, P. Santoro, J. Mori, A. Ferrante, G. Cocetta. - In: SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE. - ISSN 0304-4238. - 323:(2024 Jan 01), pp. 112469.1-112469.12. [Epub ahead of print] [10.1016/j.scienta.2023.112469]

Quality and physiological evaluation of tomato subjected to different supplemental lighting systems

A. Ali
Co-primo
;
V. Cavallaro
Co-primo
;
A. Ferrante
Penultimo
;
G. Cocetta
Ultimo
2024

Abstract

Light is a crucial mediator in plants of growth and development, secondary metabolism, and signaling of potentially beneficial phytochemicals. The present study investigated three indoor supplemental light treatments, HPS, LED, and LED+IR, applied during tomato cultivation, in which non-destructive and destructive analyses were performed at two time points to record the physiological responses and effects of these artificial lights on the growth and quality of the produce. An infrared thermometer and thermal cameras were used throughout the experiment to record temperature changes under each growing condition. LED+IR supplemented light showed a decrease in photosynthetic pigments, such as chlorophyll a, b, and carotenoids but induced an increased number of flowers, heavier tomato fruits, enhanced anthocyanins, phenolic index, lipid peroxidation, titratable acidity, and reduced nitrate accumulation. Moreover, higher generated temperatures under LED+IR helped tomato plants to reduce white fly infestation, but suppressed plant height. HPS light performed better than both LED and LED+IR in terms of total sugar accumulation, total carotenoids, water content, plant height, and leaf lipid peroxidation at harvest. Lycopene, ß-carotene, brix index were remarkable under HPS lighting but under the same conditions the number of whiteflies, however, was the highest in HPS among all the tested light treatments. In terms of fruit color analysis, maximum redness (a*), reduced hue angle, and chroma were observed under LED+IR while LED lighting in brightness (L*), and HPS in yellowness (b*) were prominent. However, LED in particular was insufficiently effective in acquiring any possible physiological and qualitative characteristics of tomato plants and fruits for the observed time span of the experiment. Hence, LED+IR has been shown to boost the accumulation of bioactive chemicals, improve fruit quality, promote more rapid and early flowering in tomato plants, and can serve as an efficient replacement for traditional indoor illumination.
Artificial lights; Indoor horticulture; TBARS; Lycopene; Titratable acidity; Hue angle
Settore AGR/04 - Orticoltura e Floricoltura
1-gen-2024
7-set-2023
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S0304423823006386-main.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Article
Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 9.38 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
9.38 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/998609
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact