Background Patients with solid or hematological tumors or neurological and immune-inflammatory disorders are potentially fragile subjects at increased risk of experiencing severe coronavirus disease 2019 and an inadequate response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination. Methods We designed a prospective Italian multicenter study to assess humoral and T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients (n = 378) with solid tumors (ST), hematological malignancies (HM), neurological disorders (ND), and immunorheumatological diseases (ID). A group of healthy controls was also included. We analyzed the immunogenicity of the primary vaccination schedule and booster dose. Results The overall seroconversion rate in patients after 2 doses was 62.1%. Significantly lower rates were observed in HM (52.4%) and ID (51.9%) than in ST (95.6%) and ND (70.7%); a lower median antibody level was detected in HM and ID versus ST and ND (P < .0001). Similar rates of patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 T-cell response were found in all disease groups, with a higher level observed in ND. The booster dose improved the humoral response in all disease groups, although to a lesser extent in HM patients, whereas the T-cell response increased similarly in all groups. In the multivariable logistic model, independent predictors of seroconversion were disease subgroup, treatment type, and age. Ongoing treatment known to affect the immune system was associated with the worst humoral response to vaccination (P < .0001) but had no effect on T-cell responses. Conclusions Immunosuppressive treatment more than disease type per se is a risk factor for a low humoral response after vaccination. The booster dose can improve both humoral and T-cell responses.Compared with healthy individuals, fragile patients have a lower rate of humoral and cellular response after primary vaccination schedule and booster dose. The type of immunosuppressive treatment has greater impact on humoral response than disease subtype, but it has a lower influence on T-cell response.

Humoral and T-cell immune response after three doses of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in fragile patients: the Italian VAX4FRAIL study / P. Corradini, C. Agrati, G. Apolone, A. Mantovani, D. Giannarelli, V. Marasco, V. Bordoni, A. Sacchi, G. Matusali, C. Salvarani, P.L. Zinzani, R. Mantegazza, F. Tagliavini, M.T. Lupo-Stanghellini, F. Ciceri, S. Damian, A. Uccelli, D. Fenoglio, N. Silvestris, F. Baldanti, G. Piaggio, G. Ciliberto, A. Morrone, F. Locatelli, V. Sinno, M. Rescigno, M. Costantini. - In: CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES. - ISSN 1058-4838. - (2022), pp. ciac404.1-ciac404.13. [10.1093/cid/ciac404]

Humoral and T-cell immune response after three doses of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in fragile patients: the Italian VAX4FRAIL study

P. Corradini
Primo
;
A. Mantovani;V. Marasco;S. Damian;M. Rescigno;
2022

Abstract

Background Patients with solid or hematological tumors or neurological and immune-inflammatory disorders are potentially fragile subjects at increased risk of experiencing severe coronavirus disease 2019 and an inadequate response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination. Methods We designed a prospective Italian multicenter study to assess humoral and T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients (n = 378) with solid tumors (ST), hematological malignancies (HM), neurological disorders (ND), and immunorheumatological diseases (ID). A group of healthy controls was also included. We analyzed the immunogenicity of the primary vaccination schedule and booster dose. Results The overall seroconversion rate in patients after 2 doses was 62.1%. Significantly lower rates were observed in HM (52.4%) and ID (51.9%) than in ST (95.6%) and ND (70.7%); a lower median antibody level was detected in HM and ID versus ST and ND (P < .0001). Similar rates of patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 T-cell response were found in all disease groups, with a higher level observed in ND. The booster dose improved the humoral response in all disease groups, although to a lesser extent in HM patients, whereas the T-cell response increased similarly in all groups. In the multivariable logistic model, independent predictors of seroconversion were disease subgroup, treatment type, and age. Ongoing treatment known to affect the immune system was associated with the worst humoral response to vaccination (P < .0001) but had no effect on T-cell responses. Conclusions Immunosuppressive treatment more than disease type per se is a risk factor for a low humoral response after vaccination. The booster dose can improve both humoral and T-cell responses.Compared with healthy individuals, fragile patients have a lower rate of humoral and cellular response after primary vaccination schedule and booster dose. The type of immunosuppressive treatment has greater impact on humoral response than disease subtype, but it has a lower influence on T-cell response.
Fragile patients; SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine; T-cell immunity; humoral immunity
Settore MED/15 - Malattie del Sangue
2022
24-mag-2022
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Clinical Infectious Disease 2022.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.25 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.25 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/934533
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 17
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 19
social impact