Employee well-being is a multidimensional construct, hence high performance work practices (HPWPs) may have diverse effects on its various dimensions. However, extant research does not provide any compelling conclusion regarding the possibility of such tradeoff effects since researchers have usually focused on single well-being dimensions while using diverse research designs (e.g. samples from different countries, different conceptualizations and measures of HPWPs and employee well-being). Diversely, this paper explores the relationship between employees’ perception of HPWPs and three well-being dimensions (health, happiness, and relational well-being) using a probabilistic sample (n = 1,364 employees), from a single country (i.e. Germany), and a set of uniform measures of HPWPs and employee well-being. The findings show that some HPWPs indeed present tradeoff effects on different dimensions of employee well-being. Therefore, we argue that it is necessary to adopt an analytic view on the relationships between HPWPs and employee well-being.

High performance work practices and their associations with health, happiness and relational well-being: are there any tradeoffs? / M. Guerci, S. Hauff, S. Gilardi. - In: THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT. - ISSN 0958-5192. - 2022:2(2022), pp. 329-359. [10.1080/09585192.2019.1695647]

High performance work practices and their associations with health, happiness and relational well-being: are there any tradeoffs?

M. Guerci
Primo
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
S. Gilardi
Ultimo
Membro del Collaboration Group
2022

Abstract

Employee well-being is a multidimensional construct, hence high performance work practices (HPWPs) may have diverse effects on its various dimensions. However, extant research does not provide any compelling conclusion regarding the possibility of such tradeoff effects since researchers have usually focused on single well-being dimensions while using diverse research designs (e.g. samples from different countries, different conceptualizations and measures of HPWPs and employee well-being). Diversely, this paper explores the relationship between employees’ perception of HPWPs and three well-being dimensions (health, happiness, and relational well-being) using a probabilistic sample (n = 1,364 employees), from a single country (i.e. Germany), and a set of uniform measures of HPWPs and employee well-being. The findings show that some HPWPs indeed present tradeoff effects on different dimensions of employee well-being. Therefore, we argue that it is necessary to adopt an analytic view on the relationships between HPWPs and employee well-being.
AMO framework; happiness well-being; health well-being; High performance work practices; relational well-being
Settore SECS-P/10 - Organizzazione Aziendale
Settore M-PSI/06 - Psicologia del Lavoro e delle Organizzazioni
2022
2-dic-2019
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Guerci Hauff Gilardi_High performance work practices_employee wellbeing_trade off_air.pdf

Open Access dal 03/06/2021

Tipologia: Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore)
Dimensione 481.22 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
481.22 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
High performance work practices and their associations with health happiness and relational well being are there any tradeoffs(1).pdf

accesso riservato

Descrizione: online first
Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 2.16 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.16 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
High performance work practices and their associations with health happiness and relational well being are there any tradeoffs.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 2.34 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.34 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/725452
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 52
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 75
social impact