Background: Arrhythmia is one of the most worrisome causes of syncope. Electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring is crucial for the management of non–low-risk patients in the emergency department (ED). However, its diagnostic accuracy and optimal duration are unknown. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of ECG monitoring in non–low-risk patients with syncope in the ED. Methods: This prospective multicenter observational study included adult patients presenting to the ED after syncope. Patients without an obvious etiology after ED evaluation who were classified by ED physicians as being at non–low risk of adverse events underwent ECG monitoring. We assessed sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic yield (defined as the proportion of patients with true-positive ECG monitoring findings) of ECG monitoring in the identification of 7- and 30-day adverse and arrhythmic events according to monitoring duration. Results: Of 242 patients included in the study, 29 patients had 7-day serious outcomes. Ten additional patients had serious outcomes at 30 days. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic yield of ECG monitoring in the identification of 7-day adverse events were 0.55 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.36 to 0.74], 0.93 (95% CI = 0.89 to 0.96), and 0.07 (95% CI = 0.04 to 0.10), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic yield of >12-hour ECG monitoring in the identification of 7-day adverse events were 0.89 (95% CI = 0.65 to 0.99), 0.78 (95% CI = 0.67 to 0.87), and 0.18 (95% CI = 0.12 to 0.28), respectively. Similar results were observed for 30-day adverse events. The median (interquartile range) ECG monitoring time was 6.5 (6 to 15) hours. ECG monitoring findings were positive in 31 patients. Conclusions: Although the overall diagnostic accuracy of ECG monitoring is fair, its sensitivity at >12 hours’ duration is substantially higher. These results suggest that prolonged (>12 hours) monitoring is a safe alternative to hospital admission in the management of non–low-risk patients with syncope in the ED.
Predictive Accuracy of Electrocardiographic Monitoring of Patients With Syncope in the Emergency Department : The SyMoNE Multicenter Study / M. Solbiati, F. Dipaola, P. Villa, S. Seghezzi, I. Casagranda, F. Rabajoli, E. Fiorini, L. Porta, G. Casazza, A. Voza, F. Barbic, N. Montano, R. Furlan, G. Costantino. - In: ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE. - ISSN 1069-6563. - 27:1(2020 Jan), pp. 15-23. [10.1111/acem.13842]
Predictive Accuracy of Electrocardiographic Monitoring of Patients With Syncope in the Emergency Department : The SyMoNE Multicenter Study
M. SolbiatiPrimo
;F. Dipaola;P. Villa;S. Seghezzi;E. Fiorini;G. Casazza;N. Montano;R. Furlan;G. Costantino
Ultimo
2020
Abstract
Background: Arrhythmia is one of the most worrisome causes of syncope. Electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring is crucial for the management of non–low-risk patients in the emergency department (ED). However, its diagnostic accuracy and optimal duration are unknown. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of ECG monitoring in non–low-risk patients with syncope in the ED. Methods: This prospective multicenter observational study included adult patients presenting to the ED after syncope. Patients without an obvious etiology after ED evaluation who were classified by ED physicians as being at non–low risk of adverse events underwent ECG monitoring. We assessed sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic yield (defined as the proportion of patients with true-positive ECG monitoring findings) of ECG monitoring in the identification of 7- and 30-day adverse and arrhythmic events according to monitoring duration. Results: Of 242 patients included in the study, 29 patients had 7-day serious outcomes. Ten additional patients had serious outcomes at 30 days. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic yield of ECG monitoring in the identification of 7-day adverse events were 0.55 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.36 to 0.74], 0.93 (95% CI = 0.89 to 0.96), and 0.07 (95% CI = 0.04 to 0.10), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic yield of >12-hour ECG monitoring in the identification of 7-day adverse events were 0.89 (95% CI = 0.65 to 0.99), 0.78 (95% CI = 0.67 to 0.87), and 0.18 (95% CI = 0.12 to 0.28), respectively. Similar results were observed for 30-day adverse events. The median (interquartile range) ECG monitoring time was 6.5 (6 to 15) hours. ECG monitoring findings were positive in 31 patients. Conclusions: Although the overall diagnostic accuracy of ECG monitoring is fair, its sensitivity at >12 hours’ duration is substantially higher. These results suggest that prolonged (>12 hours) monitoring is a safe alternative to hospital admission in the management of non–low-risk patients with syncope in the ED.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
SyMoNE telemetry.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
216.57 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
216.57 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Solbiati_et_al-2020-Academic_Emergency_Medicine.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
377.16 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
377.16 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.