The Objective of this prospective observational study was to evaluate the applicability of the simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) in patients admitted to an Emergency Medicine Ward in the Emergency Medicine Ward of a tertiary university hospital. We studied consecutive patients admitted to an Emergency Medicine Ward from the emergency department. The SAPS II was assessed in predicting overall in-hospital mortality in terms of sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. A total of 211 consecutive patients were admitted over a period of 2 months. Median SAPS II score was 28 (range 6–93), with a mean risk of in-hospital mortality of 0.17 (range 0.01–0.97) for the whole population, and an observed mortality of 15%. The area under the receiver operator curve (ROC) was 0.84 (0.77–0.91). Considering a cut-off value of SAPS II of 49, the sensitivity was 0.50 (95% CI 0.42–0.56), the specificity was 0.95 (0.92–0.98), the positive predictive value (PPV) was 0.64 (0.58–0.71), and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 0.91 (0.87–0.95), the positive likelihood ratio (pLH) was 9.9, and the negative likelihood ratio (nLH) was 0.5. If contrarily a cut-off value of SAPS II of 22 were used, the sensitivity would be 1.0, the specificity would be 0.21 (0.16–0.26), the PPV would be 0.18 (0.13–0.23), the NPV would be 1.0, the pLH would be 1.3, and the nLH would be 0.0. In this preliminary study, SAPS II predicted in-hospital mortality in patients admitted to an Emergency Ward.

Usefulness of simplified acute physiology score II in predicting mortality in patients admitted to an emergency medicine ward / R. Cosentini, C. Folli, M. Cazzaniga, S. Aliberti, F. Piffer, L. Grazioli, G. Milani, M. Pappalettera, M. Arioli, F. Tardini, A.M. Brambilla. - In: INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE. - ISSN 1828-0447. - 4:3(2009), pp. 241-247.

Usefulness of simplified acute physiology score II in predicting mortality in patients admitted to an emergency medicine ward

R. Cosentini
Primo
;
M. Cazzaniga;S. Aliberti;F. Piffer;M. Pappalettera;M. Arioli;F. Tardini
Penultimo
;
A.M. Brambilla
Ultimo
2009

Abstract

The Objective of this prospective observational study was to evaluate the applicability of the simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) in patients admitted to an Emergency Medicine Ward in the Emergency Medicine Ward of a tertiary university hospital. We studied consecutive patients admitted to an Emergency Medicine Ward from the emergency department. The SAPS II was assessed in predicting overall in-hospital mortality in terms of sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. A total of 211 consecutive patients were admitted over a period of 2 months. Median SAPS II score was 28 (range 6–93), with a mean risk of in-hospital mortality of 0.17 (range 0.01–0.97) for the whole population, and an observed mortality of 15%. The area under the receiver operator curve (ROC) was 0.84 (0.77–0.91). Considering a cut-off value of SAPS II of 49, the sensitivity was 0.50 (95% CI 0.42–0.56), the specificity was 0.95 (0.92–0.98), the positive predictive value (PPV) was 0.64 (0.58–0.71), and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 0.91 (0.87–0.95), the positive likelihood ratio (pLH) was 9.9, and the negative likelihood ratio (nLH) was 0.5. If contrarily a cut-off value of SAPS II of 22 were used, the sensitivity would be 1.0, the specificity would be 0.21 (0.16–0.26), the PPV would be 0.18 (0.13–0.23), the NPV would be 1.0, the pLH would be 1.3, and the nLH would be 0.0. In this preliminary study, SAPS II predicted in-hospital mortality in patients admitted to an Emergency Ward.
Emergency medicine ward; Mortality scores; Simplified acute physiology score
Settore MED/09 - Medicina Interna
2009
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/64750
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact