BACKGROUND AND AIM:: The resting energy expenditure (REE) of ill children is commonly estimated from prediction formulae developed in healthy children. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of commonly employed REE prediction formulae vs. indirect calorimetry (IC) in hospitalized children. METHODS:: We performed a cross-sectional study of 236 infants, children and adolescents consecutively admitted to the Intermediate Care, Nephrology, Intensive Care, Emergency, and Cystic Fibrosis Units of the De Marchi Pediatric Hospital (Milan, Italy) between September 2013 and March 2015. REE was measured by IC and estimated using the WHO, Harris-Benedict, Schofield and Oxford formulae. RESULTS:: The mean (standard deviation) difference between the estimated and measured REE was: - 1 (234) kcal/day for the WHO formula; 82 (286) kcal/day for the Harris-Benedict formula; 2 (215) kcal/day for the Schofield-weight formula;-2 (214) kcal/day for the Schofield-weight and height formula and; - 5 (221) kcal/day for the Oxford formula. Even though the WHO, Schofield and Oxford formulae gave accurate estimates of REE at the population level (small mean bias), all the formulae were not accurate enough to be employed at the individual level (large SD of bias). CONCLUSIONS:: The WHO, Harris-Benedict, Schofield and Oxford formulae should not be used to estimate REE in hospitalized children.

Accuracy of Prediction Formulae for the Assessment of Resting Energy Expenditure in Hospitalized Children / C. Agostoni, A. Edefonti, E. Calderini, E. Fossali, C. Colombo, A. Battezzati, S. Bertoli, G. Milani, A. Bisogno, M. Perrone, S. Bettocchi, V. de Cosmi, A. Mazzocchi, G. Bedogni. - In: JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION. - ISSN 0277-2116. - 63:6(2016), pp. 708-712. [10.1097/MPG.0000000000001223]

Accuracy of Prediction Formulae for the Assessment of Resting Energy Expenditure in Hospitalized Children

C. Agostoni
;
E. Calderini;E. Fossali;C. Colombo;A. Battezzati;S. Bertoli;G. Milani;V. de Cosmi;A. Mazzocchi
Penultimo
;
G. Bedogni
Ultimo
2016

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM:: The resting energy expenditure (REE) of ill children is commonly estimated from prediction formulae developed in healthy children. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of commonly employed REE prediction formulae vs. indirect calorimetry (IC) in hospitalized children. METHODS:: We performed a cross-sectional study of 236 infants, children and adolescents consecutively admitted to the Intermediate Care, Nephrology, Intensive Care, Emergency, and Cystic Fibrosis Units of the De Marchi Pediatric Hospital (Milan, Italy) between September 2013 and March 2015. REE was measured by IC and estimated using the WHO, Harris-Benedict, Schofield and Oxford formulae. RESULTS:: The mean (standard deviation) difference between the estimated and measured REE was: - 1 (234) kcal/day for the WHO formula; 82 (286) kcal/day for the Harris-Benedict formula; 2 (215) kcal/day for the Schofield-weight formula;-2 (214) kcal/day for the Schofield-weight and height formula and; - 5 (221) kcal/day for the Oxford formula. Even though the WHO, Schofield and Oxford formulae gave accurate estimates of REE at the population level (small mean bias), all the formulae were not accurate enough to be employed at the individual level (large SD of bias). CONCLUSIONS:: The WHO, Harris-Benedict, Schofield and Oxford formulae should not be used to estimate REE in hospitalized children.
gastroenterology; pediatrics, perinatology and child health
Settore BIO/09 - Fisiologia
Settore MED/38 - Pediatria Generale e Specialistica
Centro Internazionale per lo Studio della Composizione Corporea ICANS
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Bertoli_AccuracyPrediction_2016.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 491.02 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
491.02 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/462666
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact