In a lithosphere where dislocation creep dominates the steady-state flow and the viscosity is stress-dependent, the equilibrium between tectonic stress and strain rate is broken after an earthquake due to the sudden coseismic stress change. The imbalance between tectonic stress and strain rate manifests itself during the post-seismic phase and, when seismic stress is comparable or smaller than tectonic stress, it affects post-seismic deformation via an effective anisotropy along the principal axes of the tectonic stress tensor. This issue is herein discussed within the framework of post-seismic models based on power-law Maxwell rheologies and, in the limit case of seismic stress much smaller than tectonic stress, we obtain a first-order approximation of the rheology which results into a linear anisotropic Maxwell model and we find that the effective anisotropy is associated to a two-modal relaxation characterized by the Maxwell time and the Maxwell time divided by the power-law index. Thus, as far as the steady-state flow within the lithosphere is dominated by dislocation creep, linear isotropic viscoelastic rheologies, like Newtonian Maxwell and Burgers models, represent a severe oversimplification which does not account for the physics of post-seismic deformation. This new physics is discussed characterizing the stress state of the ductile layers of the lithosphere before and after the earthquake for normal, inverse and strike mechanisms and for a variety of continental seismogenic zones and thermal models.We show that the first-order approximation of the power-law Maxwell rheology is valid for a quite wide range of small and moderate earthquakes. The most restrictive upper bounds of the seismic magnitude (which hold for the hottest thermal model here considered, with lithospheric thickness of H = 80 km and surface heat flux of Q = 70 mW m-2) occur for normal and inverse earthquakes and are 5.6 or 6.3 for a lower crust of wet diorite or felsic granulite, and 6.5 for a mantle of wet olivine. The upper bounds increase by about 0.3-0.4 for strike earthquakes and by more than 1.0 for the cold thermal model (H = 200 km and Q = 50 mW m-2).

Power-law Maxwell rheologies and the interaction between tectonic and seismic deformations / G. Cambiotti, S. Rigamonti, R. Splendore, A.M. Marotta, R. Sabadini. - In: GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL. - ISSN 0956-540X. - 198:3(2014), pp. 1293-1306.

Power-law Maxwell rheologies and the interaction between tectonic and seismic deformations

G. Cambiotti
Primo
;
R. Splendore;A.M. Marotta
Penultimo
;
R. Sabadini
Ultimo
2014

Abstract

In a lithosphere where dislocation creep dominates the steady-state flow and the viscosity is stress-dependent, the equilibrium between tectonic stress and strain rate is broken after an earthquake due to the sudden coseismic stress change. The imbalance between tectonic stress and strain rate manifests itself during the post-seismic phase and, when seismic stress is comparable or smaller than tectonic stress, it affects post-seismic deformation via an effective anisotropy along the principal axes of the tectonic stress tensor. This issue is herein discussed within the framework of post-seismic models based on power-law Maxwell rheologies and, in the limit case of seismic stress much smaller than tectonic stress, we obtain a first-order approximation of the rheology which results into a linear anisotropic Maxwell model and we find that the effective anisotropy is associated to a two-modal relaxation characterized by the Maxwell time and the Maxwell time divided by the power-law index. Thus, as far as the steady-state flow within the lithosphere is dominated by dislocation creep, linear isotropic viscoelastic rheologies, like Newtonian Maxwell and Burgers models, represent a severe oversimplification which does not account for the physics of post-seismic deformation. This new physics is discussed characterizing the stress state of the ductile layers of the lithosphere before and after the earthquake for normal, inverse and strike mechanisms and for a variety of continental seismogenic zones and thermal models.We show that the first-order approximation of the power-law Maxwell rheology is valid for a quite wide range of small and moderate earthquakes. The most restrictive upper bounds of the seismic magnitude (which hold for the hottest thermal model here considered, with lithospheric thickness of H = 80 km and surface heat flux of Q = 70 mW m-2) occur for normal and inverse earthquakes and are 5.6 or 6.3 for a lower crust of wet diorite or felsic granulite, and 6.5 for a mantle of wet olivine. The upper bounds increase by about 0.3-0.4 for strike earthquakes and by more than 1.0 for the cold thermal model (H = 200 km and Q = 50 mW m-2).
No
English
Mechanics, theory, and modelling; Rheology: crust and lithosphere; Seismicity and tectonics
Settore GEO/10 - Geofisica della Terra Solida
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Ricerca di base
Pubblicazione scientifica
2014
Oxford University Press
198
3
1293
1306
14
Pubblicato
Periodico con rilevanza internazionale
http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/
scopus
crossref
NON aderisco
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Power-law Maxwell rheologies and the interaction between tectonic and seismic deformations / G. Cambiotti, S. Rigamonti, R. Splendore, A.M. Marotta, R. Sabadini. - In: GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL. - ISSN 0956-540X. - 198:3(2014), pp. 1293-1306.
reserved
Prodotti della ricerca::01 - Articolo su periodico
5
262
Article (author)
si
G. Cambiotti, S. Rigamonti, R. Splendore, A.M. Marotta, R. Sabadini
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Geophys. J. Int.-2014-Cambiotti-1293-306.pdf

accesso riservato

Descrizione: Articolo principlae
Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.68 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.68 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/263294
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact