Were Oceanic Plateaus Instrumental for Calcareous Nannoplankton Evolution?

The history of calcareous nannoplankton shows a general increase in species richness through the Mesozoic. Fertility and chemistry of the oceans, climate and pCO2 seem instrumental for nannoplankton abundance, diversification and adaptation, but high-resolution chronology of paleobiological and geological events is crucial for the understanding of evolutionary processes relative to ecosystem perturbations. Natural variations in atmospheric CO2 are essentially triggered by igneous activity and the role of ocean crust production in the evolution of seawater composition, nutrient cycling, climate change and, consequently, in calcareous nannoplankton biodiversity, might be more relevant than generally thought. Indeed, two major steps in nannofloral Mesozoic evolution correlate with construction of gigantic oceanic plateaus, namely the Shatsky Rise (SR) (Tithonian/Berriasian boundary interval) and the Ontong Java Plateau (OJP) (Barremian/Aptian boundary interval). During the latest Jurassic calcareous nannoplankton experienced a rapid diversification and rise in abundance of several taxa including heavily calcified nannoliths with consequent major increase in biogenic calcite production. The Tithonian origination of coccoliths and nannoliths suggests ideal paleoecological conditions for calcareous nannoplankton, presumably thriving in stable, relatively oligotrophic and cool oceans under low pCO2. Recent data indicate that this speciation and calcification episode was interrupted during magnetochron CM19r, prior to massive diversification of nannoconids. In the late Barremian-early Aptian interval, the nannoconid decline and crisis are paralleled by a major nannoplankton (mainly coccolith) speciation episode. Such calcification failure and coccolith diversification might reflect disruption of the thermocline, increased fertility and warming under excess CO2 levels. These evolutionary steps show rapid speciation, but differ because nannoliths became dominant in the late Tithonian whereas suffered a major crisis in the early Aptian, although without extinctions. Can SR and OJP be used to understand evolutionary patterns of oceanic calcifiers? Was the massive emplacement of submarine and/or subaerial basalts and CO2 outgassing instrumental for directing biological innovation? Increased volcanic CO2 could induce ocean acidification and hamper nannoplankton calcification, presumably favoring production and diversification of small coccoliths and perhaps inducing extinctions. The appearance and rapid development of heavily calcified nannoliths in the late Tithonian is odd if took place during the construction of the huge SR. However, early subaerial volcanism of the vast paleoequatorial Shatsky archipelago might have turned the climate into cooler conditions and altered oceanic structure and circulation, possibly establishing a thermocline in the lower photic zone. Perhaps the marked decrease in nannolith calcification during CM 19r was triggered by the rapid eruption of SR submarine edifice, similarly to the nannoconid crisis linked to OJP volcanism. The combination of climate change, alteration of ocean chemistry, structure, circulation and fertility during formation of oceanic plateaus might explain diverse tempo and mode of nannoplankton innovation.