The principle of the child’s best interest, as established in the United Na- tions Convention on the Rights of the Child, holds a prominent role in hu- man rights law as a substantive, interpretative, and procedural right. Within the framework of the Council of Europe, this principle is applied in cases ad- judicated by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), particularly con- cerning family ties, migration, violence, and identity. While the ECtHR has acknowledged the child’s best interest, significant inconsistencies arise in its application, especially when addressing vulnerable groups such as girls and children from minority or migrant communities. Intersectionality – recogniz- ing the compounded e"ects of overlapping social categories like age, gender, and ethnicity – has not been fully integrated into the ECtHR’s jurisprudence, resulting in insu)cient protection in cases involving such vulnerabilities. A comparative perspective highlights the broader adoption of intersectionality by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, which has strengthened pro- tections against intersectional discrimination. Greater consistency and inclu- siveness in applying the child’s best interest principle within the European human rights framework could address existing gaps, ensuring stronger safe- guards for all children, particularly those at the intersection of multiple forms of discrimination.
The Council of Europe and Beyond: Children’s Rights and Intersectionality / C. Nardocci - In: The Family (R)evolution : Insights into Rising Parenthood Issues / [a cura di] M. Caldironi, S.P. Perrino. - Prima edizione. - [s.l] : Mucchi Editore, 2025. - ISBN 9791281716490. - pp. 525-544 (( convegno Just Parents. Legal protection for social parents tenutosi a Modena nel 2024.
The Council of Europe and Beyond: Children’s Rights and Intersectionality
C. Nardocci
2025
Abstract
The principle of the child’s best interest, as established in the United Na- tions Convention on the Rights of the Child, holds a prominent role in hu- man rights law as a substantive, interpretative, and procedural right. Within the framework of the Council of Europe, this principle is applied in cases ad- judicated by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), particularly con- cerning family ties, migration, violence, and identity. While the ECtHR has acknowledged the child’s best interest, significant inconsistencies arise in its application, especially when addressing vulnerable groups such as girls and children from minority or migrant communities. Intersectionality – recogniz- ing the compounded e"ects of overlapping social categories like age, gender, and ethnicity – has not been fully integrated into the ECtHR’s jurisprudence, resulting in insu)cient protection in cases involving such vulnerabilities. A comparative perspective highlights the broader adoption of intersectionality by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, which has strengthened pro- tections against intersectional discrimination. Greater consistency and inclu- siveness in applying the child’s best interest principle within the European human rights framework could address existing gaps, ensuring stronger safe- guards for all children, particularly those at the intersection of multiple forms of discrimination.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Nardocci C..pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
762.29 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
762.29 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




