The principle of the child’s best interest, as established in the United Na- tions Convention on the Rights of the Child, holds a prominent role in hu- man rights law as a substantive, interpretative, and procedural right. Within the framework of the Council of Europe, this principle is applied in cases ad- judicated by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), particularly con- cerning family ties, migration, violence, and identity. While the ECtHR has acknowledged the child’s best interest, significant inconsistencies arise in its application, especially when addressing vulnerable groups such as girls and children from minority or migrant communities. Intersectionality – recogniz- ing the compounded e"ects of overlapping social categories like age, gender, and ethnicity – has not been fully integrated into the ECtHR’s jurisprudence, resulting in insu)cient protection in cases involving such vulnerabilities. A comparative perspective highlights the broader adoption of intersectionality by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, which has strengthened pro- tections against intersectional discrimination. Greater consistency and inclu- siveness in applying the child’s best interest principle within the European human rights framework could address existing gaps, ensuring stronger safe- guards for all children, particularly those at the intersection of multiple forms of discrimination.

The Council of Europe and Beyond: Children’s Rights and Intersectionality / C. Nardocci - In: The Family (R)evolution : Insights into Rising Parenthood Issues / [a cura di] M. Caldironi, S.P. Perrino. - Prima edizione. - [s.l] : Mucchi Editore, 2025. - ISBN 9791281716490. - pp. 525-544 (( convegno Just Parents. Legal protection for social parents tenutosi a Modena nel 2024.

The Council of Europe and Beyond: Children’s Rights and Intersectionality

C. Nardocci
2025

Abstract

The principle of the child’s best interest, as established in the United Na- tions Convention on the Rights of the Child, holds a prominent role in hu- man rights law as a substantive, interpretative, and procedural right. Within the framework of the Council of Europe, this principle is applied in cases ad- judicated by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), particularly con- cerning family ties, migration, violence, and identity. While the ECtHR has acknowledged the child’s best interest, significant inconsistencies arise in its application, especially when addressing vulnerable groups such as girls and children from minority or migrant communities. Intersectionality – recogniz- ing the compounded e"ects of overlapping social categories like age, gender, and ethnicity – has not been fully integrated into the ECtHR’s jurisprudence, resulting in insu)cient protection in cases involving such vulnerabilities. A comparative perspective highlights the broader adoption of intersectionality by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, which has strengthened pro- tections against intersectional discrimination. Greater consistency and inclu- siveness in applying the child’s best interest principle within the European human rights framework could address existing gaps, ensuring stronger safe- guards for all children, particularly those at the intersection of multiple forms of discrimination.
Settore GIUR-05/A - Diritto costituzionale e pubblico
2025
https://mucchieditore.it/prodotto/the-family-revolution/
Book Part (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Nardocci C..pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 762.29 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
762.29 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1191796
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact