The study compares the overall sustainability of two organic and two conventional rice farming systems during the 2022 drought. The research aimed to develop an experiment exploring the ability of an integrated methodological approach to identify tradeoffs and provide actionable insights for a sustainable agricultural transition under extreme climate stress. To this aim, the study employed economic analysis, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) for environmental impact, and the OASIS framework for broader social and resilience indicators. The study revealed tradeoffs between the economic efficiency of conventional rice farming and the ecological resilience of organic systems, a conclusion made possible only through its integrated assessment methodology. By combining different methods, the research suggested that while conventional farms achieved clear financial superiority and greater efficiency per ton of rice, organic systems showcased superior ecological performance per hectare, greater biodiversity, and enhanced resilience. This highlights a crucial research frontier focused on designing hybrid systems or new economic models that can translate the environmental resilience of organic methods into tangible market value, effectively resolving the very tradeoffs this comprehensive assessment suggested.

Sustainability Assessment of Rice Farming: Insights from Four Italian Farms Under Climate Stress / G. Savoini, P. De Marinis, A. Casson, A.D. Narote, R. Guidetti, S. Bocchi, V. Vaglia. - In: AGRICULTURE. - ISSN 2077-0472. - 15:17(2025), pp. 1797.1-1797.36. [10.3390/agriculture15171797]

Sustainability Assessment of Rice Farming: Insights from Four Italian Farms Under Climate Stress

G. Savoini
Primo
;
P. De Marinis
Secondo
;
A. Casson;A.D. Narote;R. Guidetti;S. Bocchi
Penultimo
;
V. Vaglia
Ultimo
2025

Abstract

The study compares the overall sustainability of two organic and two conventional rice farming systems during the 2022 drought. The research aimed to develop an experiment exploring the ability of an integrated methodological approach to identify tradeoffs and provide actionable insights for a sustainable agricultural transition under extreme climate stress. To this aim, the study employed economic analysis, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) for environmental impact, and the OASIS framework for broader social and resilience indicators. The study revealed tradeoffs between the economic efficiency of conventional rice farming and the ecological resilience of organic systems, a conclusion made possible only through its integrated assessment methodology. By combining different methods, the research suggested that while conventional farms achieved clear financial superiority and greater efficiency per ton of rice, organic systems showcased superior ecological performance per hectare, greater biodiversity, and enhanced resilience. This highlights a crucial research frontier focused on designing hybrid systems or new economic models that can translate the environmental resilience of organic methods into tangible market value, effectively resolving the very tradeoffs this comprehensive assessment suggested.
agroecology; conventional farming; organic farming; rice; sustainability
Settore AGRI-02/A - Agronomia e coltivazioni erbacee
2025
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
agriculture-15-01797-v2.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.74 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.74 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1184875
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
  • OpenAlex 1
social impact