Background: Bowel preparation represents a significant issue to high-quality colonoscopy. Oral mannitol requires a single dose, is of low volume, and has a pleasant taste and rapid action. Aims: This SATISFACTION study compared single-dose (same day) oral mannitol 100 g/750 mL with standard split-dose PEG-ASC2 L (MoviPrep®). Methods: The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with adequate bowel cleansing. Secondary endpoints included efficacy (adenoma detection rate, caecal intubation rate, time of evacuation), safety (intestinal gases concentration, haemato-chemical parameters, adverse events), and patient satisfaction. Results: The study included 703 patients (352 treated with mannitol and 351 with PEG-ASC). Mannitol was not inferior to PEG-ASC for the primary endpoint (91.1 % and 95.5 %, respectively; p-value for the non-inferiority =0.0131). There was no significant difference for secondary efficacy endpoints. The acceptability profile was significantly better in the mannitol group for ease of use, taste, and willingness to reuse (p < 0.0001 for all). The concentration of intestinal gases (H2, CH4) was similar between groups and well below those potentially critical. Conclusions: The SATISFACTION study indicated that low-volume, single-dose mannitol may satisfy an unmet clinical need since it was more acceptable to the patient and not inferior to the split-dose PEG-ASC for bowel cleansing efficacy.
Mannitol for bowel preparation: Efficacy and safety results from the SATISFACTION randomised clinical trial / M. Vecchi, G.E. Tontini, G. Fiori, P. Bocus, M. Carnovali, P. Cesaro, G. Costamagna, D.D. Paolo, L. Elli, O. Fedorishina, C. Hinkel, R. Jakobs, S. Kashin, M. Magnoli, G. Manes, E. Melnikova, A. Orsatti, T. Ponchon, A. Prada, F. Radaelli, S. Sferrazza, P. Soru, J.C. Valats, V. Veselov, C. Spada, P. Uebel, A. Amato, J.P. Arpurt, S. Attardo, M. Balzarini, S. Bellon, M. Benini, P. Blanc, G. Bonato, D. Bordin, F. Bossa, I. Bravi, N. Bulanova, E. Bunkova, S. Cadoni, R. Cannizzaro, F. Cavallaro, G. Ciprandi, M. Codazzi, M. Devani, L.P. Dicembre, E. Garanina, M. Guerra, S. Guseynova, D. Hartmann, P. Herberg, D. Janke, A. Khitaryan, V. Lombardo, M. Lovera, S. Maiero, S. Marangi, A. Massella, M. Mutignani, V.G. Neustroev, K. Nikolskaya, P. Occhipinti, A. Orekhov, V. Ovechkin, L.G. Papparella, M. Pioche, A. Pisani, C. Pretti, M. Puzzono, S. Realdon, P. Reiche, R. Penagini, R. Kuvaev, E. Rondonotti, F. Rudler, M. Schettino, S. Segato, M. Shapina, L. Spina, P.A. Testoni, C. Trovato, N. Tuktagulov, L.M. Vetrone, E. Viale, A.A. Vladimirova, J. Vollmar, F. Zara, T. Zimmermann. - In: DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE. - ISSN 1590-8658. - 57:2(2025), pp. 574-583. [10.1016/j.dld.2024.09.024]
Mannitol for bowel preparation: Efficacy and safety results from the SATISFACTION randomised clinical trial
M. VecchiPrimo
;G.E. TontiniSecondo
;L. Elli;R. Penagini;
2025
Abstract
Background: Bowel preparation represents a significant issue to high-quality colonoscopy. Oral mannitol requires a single dose, is of low volume, and has a pleasant taste and rapid action. Aims: This SATISFACTION study compared single-dose (same day) oral mannitol 100 g/750 mL with standard split-dose PEG-ASC2 L (MoviPrep®). Methods: The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with adequate bowel cleansing. Secondary endpoints included efficacy (adenoma detection rate, caecal intubation rate, time of evacuation), safety (intestinal gases concentration, haemato-chemical parameters, adverse events), and patient satisfaction. Results: The study included 703 patients (352 treated with mannitol and 351 with PEG-ASC). Mannitol was not inferior to PEG-ASC for the primary endpoint (91.1 % and 95.5 %, respectively; p-value for the non-inferiority =0.0131). There was no significant difference for secondary efficacy endpoints. The acceptability profile was significantly better in the mannitol group for ease of use, taste, and willingness to reuse (p < 0.0001 for all). The concentration of intestinal gases (H2, CH4) was similar between groups and well below those potentially critical. Conclusions: The SATISFACTION study indicated that low-volume, single-dose mannitol may satisfy an unmet clinical need since it was more acceptable to the patient and not inferior to the split-dose PEG-ASC for bowel cleansing efficacy.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1-s2.0-S1590865824010417-main.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
1.58 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.58 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




