Introduction: The processing of the bone tissue presents multiple problems related to decalcification and it is often based on the experience of the operator. The aim of this study is to test bone tissue antigen preservation after different decalcification methods in order to verify which is the most suitable to obtain guidelines for laboratory routine. Materials and Methods: Medial condyle of the left femur of swine, sheep, dogs, mice and rats were fixed and decalcified with two different solutions: A, 1.85% hydrochloric acid, 4% formic acid; B, 7.5% citric acid, 25% formic acid. Integrity of tissue antigenicity were evaluated by means of two commercial antibodies for collagen I by immunofluorescence (IF). IF peak intensity was analysed. Results: Antigen preservation was observed in both treatments in dog, sheep, and swine. Indeed, the bone sections from mouse and rat lost their link ability for the antibodies. IF peaks revealed to be higher with B solution than A in sheep (P<0.01), while no differences were found in swine and dog. Furthermore, IF peaks for one of the two antibodies revealed to be higher in sheep and swine (P<0.01), but no differences among the two antibodies were found in dog. Conclusion: B solution seems to better preserve antigenicity of bone tissue in sheep and one of the two antibodies works better in sheep and swine. With this research we intended to define guidelines for trabecular bone decalcification based on the animal species and antigen preservation which is a basic tool for tissue engineering.

Antigen preservation after decalcification: can we have a guideline for everyday bone-related laboratory routine? / M.L. Matela, V. Herrera Millar, F. Biancoli, M. Pallaoro, G. Bosi, A. Di Giancamillo, S. Modina. ((Intervento presentato al 33. convegno Congress of the European Association of Veterinary Anatomists tenutosi a Ghent University - online nel 2021.

Antigen preservation after decalcification: can we have a guideline for everyday bone-related laboratory routine?

M.L. Matela
Primo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
V. Herrera Millar
Secondo
Formal Analysis
;
M. Pallaoro
Formal Analysis
;
G. Bosi
Formal Analysis
;
A. Di Giancamillo
Penultimo
Writing – Review & Editing
;
S. Modina
Ultimo
Writing – Review & Editing
2021

Abstract

Introduction: The processing of the bone tissue presents multiple problems related to decalcification and it is often based on the experience of the operator. The aim of this study is to test bone tissue antigen preservation after different decalcification methods in order to verify which is the most suitable to obtain guidelines for laboratory routine. Materials and Methods: Medial condyle of the left femur of swine, sheep, dogs, mice and rats were fixed and decalcified with two different solutions: A, 1.85% hydrochloric acid, 4% formic acid; B, 7.5% citric acid, 25% formic acid. Integrity of tissue antigenicity were evaluated by means of two commercial antibodies for collagen I by immunofluorescence (IF). IF peak intensity was analysed. Results: Antigen preservation was observed in both treatments in dog, sheep, and swine. Indeed, the bone sections from mouse and rat lost their link ability for the antibodies. IF peaks revealed to be higher with B solution than A in sheep (P<0.01), while no differences were found in swine and dog. Furthermore, IF peaks for one of the two antibodies revealed to be higher in sheep and swine (P<0.01), but no differences among the two antibodies were found in dog. Conclusion: B solution seems to better preserve antigenicity of bone tissue in sheep and one of the two antibodies works better in sheep and swine. With this research we intended to define guidelines for trabecular bone decalcification based on the animal species and antigen preservation which is a basic tool for tissue engineering.
18-lug-2021
Settore MVET-01/A - Anatomia veterinaria
Antigen preservation after decalcification: can we have a guideline for everyday bone-related laboratory routine? / M.L. Matela, V. Herrera Millar, F. Biancoli, M. Pallaoro, G. Bosi, A. Di Giancamillo, S. Modina. ((Intervento presentato al 33. convegno Congress of the European Association of Veterinary Anatomists tenutosi a Ghent University - online nel 2021.
Conference Object
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1112430
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact