In this paper, we will reflect on some tacit assumptions of qualitative research, starting from criteria widely used to evaluate its quality, for example, in peer review processes. Therefore, we will analyze the COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative studies (COREQ) and then report some critics that have been recently moved to them. We will conclude by analyzing the improvements these reflections on COREQ can bring to those involved in qualitative research, especially in education
I criteri COREQ per valutare la validità degli studi qualitativi: un percorso a ritroso per illuminarne alcuni presupposti taciti = A backward path to illuminate their tacit assumptions / K. Daniele, L. Zannini. - In: STUDIUM EDUCATIONIS. - ISSN 1722-8395. - 24:1(2023 Jul 21), pp. 84-95. [10.7346/SE-012023-10]
I criteri COREQ per valutare la validità degli studi qualitativi: un percorso a ritroso per illuminarne alcuni presupposti taciti = A backward path to illuminate their tacit assumptions
K. DanielePrimo
;L. Zannini
Ultimo
2023
Abstract
In this paper, we will reflect on some tacit assumptions of qualitative research, starting from criteria widely used to evaluate its quality, for example, in peer review processes. Therefore, we will analyze the COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative studies (COREQ) and then report some critics that have been recently moved to them. We will conclude by analyzing the improvements these reflections on COREQ can bring to those involved in qualitative research, especially in educationFile | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Daniele,+Zannini in Studium Educationis.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
4.15 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
4.15 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.