There is a common agreement that bracing is appropriate for curves between 20 and 40 degrees for the Cobb angle during growth, but for larger curves, the experts' opinions are not consistent. We designed this systematic review to report the updated evidence about the effectiveness of bracing in scoliosis patients with curves >= 40 degrees and a residual growth period. We included randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective observational studies, and case series addressing the effect of bracing in patients with idiopathic scoliosis during growth with curves >= 40 degrees for the Cobb angle, published from 2000 onwards. Outcome: The percentage of patients with surgery, curves above 45 degrees or 50 degrees, and a Cobb angle change are all included in the study. Nine papers (563 patients, average worst curve of 44.8 degrees) are included: four are retrospective case series, two are retrospective and two are prospective cohort studies, and one is a prospective controlled study. The overall quality was good, with respect to the type of design. A total of 32% of the patients improved, 26% were stable, and 42% worsened. The rate of improvement ranged from 11% to 78%; the rate of worsening ranged from 4% to 64%. There are some studies suggesting the use of bracing even in the case of severe curves when patients are motivated by trying to avoid surgery. More and better-quality research with coherent outcome criteria is needed.

Bracing Interventions Can Help Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis with Surgical Indication: A Systematic Review / F. Zaina, C. Cordani, S. Donzelli, S.G. Lazzarini, C. Arienti, M.J. Del Furia, S. Negrini. - In: CHILDREN. - ISSN 2227-9067. - 9:11(2022 Oct 31), pp. 1672.1-1672.13. [10.3390/children9111672]

Bracing Interventions Can Help Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis with Surgical Indication: A Systematic Review

C. Cordani
Secondo
;
S. Negrini
Ultimo
2022

Abstract

There is a common agreement that bracing is appropriate for curves between 20 and 40 degrees for the Cobb angle during growth, but for larger curves, the experts' opinions are not consistent. We designed this systematic review to report the updated evidence about the effectiveness of bracing in scoliosis patients with curves >= 40 degrees and a residual growth period. We included randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective observational studies, and case series addressing the effect of bracing in patients with idiopathic scoliosis during growth with curves >= 40 degrees for the Cobb angle, published from 2000 onwards. Outcome: The percentage of patients with surgery, curves above 45 degrees or 50 degrees, and a Cobb angle change are all included in the study. Nine papers (563 patients, average worst curve of 44.8 degrees) are included: four are retrospective case series, two are retrospective and two are prospective cohort studies, and one is a prospective controlled study. The overall quality was good, with respect to the type of design. A total of 32% of the patients improved, 26% were stable, and 42% worsened. The rate of improvement ranged from 11% to 78%; the rate of worsening ranged from 4% to 64%. There are some studies suggesting the use of bracing even in the case of severe curves when patients are motivated by trying to avoid surgery. More and better-quality research with coherent outcome criteria is needed.
brace; conservative treatment; idiopathic scoliosis; pediatrics; rehabilitation; surgery; systematic review
Settore MED/34 - Medicina Fisica e Riabilitativa
31-ott-2022
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Zaina_children_Bracing Interventions Can Help.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Review
Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 540.95 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
540.95 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/953185
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact