BackgroundWe aim to identify the prevalence and the role of the MAP2K1 K57N mutation in predicting resistance to anti-EGFR agents in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed tumor-based next generation sequencing (NGS) results from mCRC patients screened for enrollment in the GO40872/STARTRK-2 clinical trial between July 2019 and March 2021. Then, in patients harboring microsatellite stable (MSS) RAS and BRAF wild-type MAP2K1 mutant mCRC, we reviewed outcome to treatment with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. ResultsA total of 246 mCRC patients were screened. Most of them, 215/220 (97.7%), were diagnosed with MSS mCRC and 112/215 (52.1%) with MSS, RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC. Among the latter, 2/112 (1.8%) had MAP2K1 K57N mutant mCRC and both received anti-EGFR monotherapy as third line treatment. In both patients, MAP2K1 K57N mutant tumors proved primary resistant to anti-EGFR agent panitumumab monotherapy. Of interest, one of these patients was treated with anti-EGFR agents three times throughout his course of treatment, achieving some clinical benefit only when associated with other cytotoxic agents (FOLFOX or irinotecan). ConclusionWe verified in a clinical real-world setting that MAP2K1 K57N mutation is a resistance mechanism to anti-EGFR agents in mCRC. Thus, we suggest avoiding the administration of these drugs to MSS RAS and BRAF wild-type MAP2K1 N57K mutant mCRC.

Case Report: MAP2K1 K57N mutation is associated with primary resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer / G. Mauri, G. Patelli, V. Gori, C. Lauricella, B. Mussolin, A. Amatu, K. Bencardino, F. Tosi, E. Bonazzina, E. Bonoldi, A. Bardelli, S. Siena, A. Sartore-Bianchi. - In: FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 2234-943X. - 12:(2022), pp. 1030232.1-1030232.7. [10.3389/fonc.2022.1030232]

Case Report: MAP2K1 K57N mutation is associated with primary resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer

G. Mauri
Primo
;
G. Patelli
Secondo
;
V. Gori;F. Tosi;S. Siena
Penultimo
;
A. Sartore-Bianchi
Ultimo
2022

Abstract

BackgroundWe aim to identify the prevalence and the role of the MAP2K1 K57N mutation in predicting resistance to anti-EGFR agents in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed tumor-based next generation sequencing (NGS) results from mCRC patients screened for enrollment in the GO40872/STARTRK-2 clinical trial between July 2019 and March 2021. Then, in patients harboring microsatellite stable (MSS) RAS and BRAF wild-type MAP2K1 mutant mCRC, we reviewed outcome to treatment with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. ResultsA total of 246 mCRC patients were screened. Most of them, 215/220 (97.7%), were diagnosed with MSS mCRC and 112/215 (52.1%) with MSS, RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC. Among the latter, 2/112 (1.8%) had MAP2K1 K57N mutant mCRC and both received anti-EGFR monotherapy as third line treatment. In both patients, MAP2K1 K57N mutant tumors proved primary resistant to anti-EGFR agent panitumumab monotherapy. Of interest, one of these patients was treated with anti-EGFR agents three times throughout his course of treatment, achieving some clinical benefit only when associated with other cytotoxic agents (FOLFOX or irinotecan). ConclusionWe verified in a clinical real-world setting that MAP2K1 K57N mutation is a resistance mechanism to anti-EGFR agents in mCRC. Thus, we suggest avoiding the administration of these drugs to MSS RAS and BRAF wild-type MAP2K1 N57K mutant mCRC.
MAP2K1; MEK; colorectal cancer; panitumumab; resistance mechanisms
Settore MED/06 - Oncologia Medica
2022
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Mauri et al Front Oncol 2022.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 2.06 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.06 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/953141
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact