Objective: To explore students’ perceived quality of the intensive care unit learning environment during their rotations; to compare these perceptions with that reported by students attending other settings and to assess correlations between the perceptions regarding the quality of the environment and the compe- tences learned. Research methodology: A secondary analysis of data collected by a national cross-sectional study carried out in Italy. A total of 9607 nursing students participated; they ranked the intensive care units’ quality, as assessed by the Clinical Learning Quality Evaluation Index; the perceived competences learned were also ranked with a Likert scale; from 0 = None to 3 = Very much. Results: A total of 323 (3.5%) participants attended their rotation in an intensive care unit. They perceived the quality of the environment to be significantly higher (n = 2.11 out of 3) than those rotating in non- intensive care unit wards (n = 1.91; p < 0.001). The competences learned by intensive care unit students were significantly higher than that reported by students attending non-intensive care unit wards (n = 2.31 out of 3 vs 2.06 out of 3; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Intensive care units are highly appreciated by students, both in terms of their quality learning environment and their capacity to promote learning compared to other settings. Therefore, intensive care units should be considered as a place for clinical rotation to promote positive attitudes regarding critical care patients.

Are intensive care units good places for nursing students' learning compared to other settings? Findings from an Italian national study / M. Danielis, A. Lucia Leona Destrebecq, S. Terzoni, A. Palese. - In: INTENSIVE & CRITICAL CARE NURSING. - ISSN 0964-3397. - 66:(2021), pp. 103074.1-103074.7. [10.1016/j.iccn.2021.103074]

Are intensive care units good places for nursing students' learning compared to other settings? Findings from an Italian national study

M. Danielis;A.L.L.M.G. Destrebecq;S. Terzoni;
2021

Abstract

Objective: To explore students’ perceived quality of the intensive care unit learning environment during their rotations; to compare these perceptions with that reported by students attending other settings and to assess correlations between the perceptions regarding the quality of the environment and the compe- tences learned. Research methodology: A secondary analysis of data collected by a national cross-sectional study carried out in Italy. A total of 9607 nursing students participated; they ranked the intensive care units’ quality, as assessed by the Clinical Learning Quality Evaluation Index; the perceived competences learned were also ranked with a Likert scale; from 0 = None to 3 = Very much. Results: A total of 323 (3.5%) participants attended their rotation in an intensive care unit. They perceived the quality of the environment to be significantly higher (n = 2.11 out of 3) than those rotating in non- intensive care unit wards (n = 1.91; p < 0.001). The competences learned by intensive care unit students were significantly higher than that reported by students attending non-intensive care unit wards (n = 2.31 out of 3 vs 2.06 out of 3; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Intensive care units are highly appreciated by students, both in terms of their quality learning environment and their capacity to promote learning compared to other settings. Therefore, intensive care units should be considered as a place for clinical rotation to promote positive attitudes regarding critical care patients.
Clinical learning environment; Critical care; Intensive care unit; Nursing education; Nursing students
Settore MED/45 - Scienze Infermieristiche Generali, Cliniche e Pediatriche
2021
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Articolo+pubblicato.pdf

accesso riservato

Descrizione: Article
Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 287.96 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
287.96 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/952666
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact