Do development banks influence syndicate structure? Using a global dataset across 48 countries of 11,949 syndicated loans from 2001 to 2016, we show that lead banks decrease their loan shares and form less concentrated structures in mixed syndicates that include both development banks and private-sector banks as participant lenders. In line with the social view on the role of development banks, we find that such an effect is stronger during periods of financial instability, particularly for the green industry and in the case of borrowers that are financially constrained. Conversely, we do not find any evidence that mixed syndicates exhibit a different syndicate structure for political distortions. Lastly, we find that mixed syndicates are not associated with higher covenant violations and an increasing of the borrowers’ risk profile after the loan origination. Our results are robust when accounting for, among others, relationship lending, asymmetric information within the syndicate, lenders’ lending expertise, borrowers’ opacity, types of loan, and ranking hierarchy in the syndicate.
Development banks and the syndicate structure: Evidence from a world sample / M. Degl’Innocenti, M. Frigerio, S. Zhou. - In: JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL FINANCE. - ISSN 0927-5398. - 66:(2022 Mar), pp. 99-120. [10.1016/j.jempfin.2022.01.002]
Development banks and the syndicate structure: Evidence from a world sample
M. Degl’InnocentiPrimo
;
2022
Abstract
Do development banks influence syndicate structure? Using a global dataset across 48 countries of 11,949 syndicated loans from 2001 to 2016, we show that lead banks decrease their loan shares and form less concentrated structures in mixed syndicates that include both development banks and private-sector banks as participant lenders. In line with the social view on the role of development banks, we find that such an effect is stronger during periods of financial instability, particularly for the green industry and in the case of borrowers that are financially constrained. Conversely, we do not find any evidence that mixed syndicates exhibit a different syndicate structure for political distortions. Lastly, we find that mixed syndicates are not associated with higher covenant violations and an increasing of the borrowers’ risk profile after the loan origination. Our results are robust when accounting for, among others, relationship lending, asymmetric information within the syndicate, lenders’ lending expertise, borrowers’ opacity, types of loan, and ranking hierarchy in the syndicate.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Paper_JEF_R&R2_def.doc
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore)
Dimensione
911.5 kB
Formato
Microsoft Word
|
911.5 kB | Microsoft Word | Visualizza/Apri |
SSRN-id3615477.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore)
Dimensione
773.07 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
773.07 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
1-s2.0-S092753982200010X-main.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
589.64 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
589.64 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.