Do development banks influence syndicate structure? Using a global dataset across 48 countries of 11,949 syndicated loans from 2001 to 2016, we show that lead banks decrease their loan shares and form less concentrated structures in mixed syndicates that include both development banks and private-sector banks as participant lenders. In line with the social view on the role of development banks, we find that such an effect is stronger during periods of financial instability, particularly for the green industry and in the case of borrowers that are financially constrained. Conversely, we do not find any evidence that mixed syndicates exhibit a different syndicate structure for political distortions. Lastly, we find that mixed syndicates are not associated with higher covenant violations and an increasing of the borrowers’ risk profile after the loan origination. Our results are robust when accounting for, among others, relationship lending, asymmetric information within the syndicate, lenders’ lending expertise, borrowers’ opacity, types of loan, and ranking hierarchy in the syndicate.

Development banks and the syndicate structure: Evidence from a world sample / M. Degl’Innocenti, M. Frigerio, S. Zhou. - In: JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL FINANCE. - ISSN 0927-5398. - 66:(2022 Mar), pp. 99-120. [10.1016/j.jempfin.2022.01.002]

Development banks and the syndicate structure: Evidence from a world sample

M. Degl’Innocenti
Primo
;
2022

Abstract

Do development banks influence syndicate structure? Using a global dataset across 48 countries of 11,949 syndicated loans from 2001 to 2016, we show that lead banks decrease their loan shares and form less concentrated structures in mixed syndicates that include both development banks and private-sector banks as participant lenders. In line with the social view on the role of development banks, we find that such an effect is stronger during periods of financial instability, particularly for the green industry and in the case of borrowers that are financially constrained. Conversely, we do not find any evidence that mixed syndicates exhibit a different syndicate structure for political distortions. Lastly, we find that mixed syndicates are not associated with higher covenant violations and an increasing of the borrowers’ risk profile after the loan origination. Our results are robust when accounting for, among others, relationship lending, asymmetric information within the syndicate, lenders’ lending expertise, borrowers’ opacity, types of loan, and ranking hierarchy in the syndicate.
Development banks; Loan-level data; Syndicate structure; Syndicated loan market;
Settore SECS-P/11 - Economia degli Intermediari Finanziari
mar-2022
25-gen-2022
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Paper_JEF_R&R2_def.doc

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore)
Dimensione 911.5 kB
Formato Microsoft Word
911.5 kB Microsoft Word Visualizza/Apri
SSRN-id3615477.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore)
Dimensione 773.07 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
773.07 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
1-s2.0-S092753982200010X-main.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 589.64 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
589.64 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/899800
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact