Nowadays the higher nutritional value of whole grains compared to refined grains is recognized. In the last decade, there has been a renewed interest in the ancient wheat varieties for producing high-value food products with enhanced health benefits. This study compared two ancient grains, two heritage grains, and four modern grains grown in the same agronomic conditions considering not only their chemical characteristics, but also their biological effects. Whole grain flours were obtained and used to make bread. Bread was in vitro digested, the digesta were supplemented to HepG2 cells, and the biological effects of supplementation were evaluated. In addition, cells previously supplemented with the different digested bread types were then exposed to inflammatory agents to evidence possible protective effects of the pre-treatments. Despite the impossibility to discriminate bread made with different grains based on their chemical composition, results herein reported evidence that their supplementation to cultured cells exerts different effects, confirming the potential health benefits of ancient grains. This research represents an advancement for the evaluation of the apparent positive effects of ancient grains and the formulation of cereal-based products with added nutritional value.

Health benefits of ancient grains. Comparison among bread made with ancient, heritage and modern grain flours in human cultured cells / V. Valli, A. Taccari, M. Di Nunzio, F. Danesi, A. Bordoni. - In: FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL. - ISSN 0963-9969. - 107(2018), pp. 206-215. [10.1016/j.foodres.2018.02.032]

Health benefits of ancient grains. Comparison among bread made with ancient, heritage and modern grain flours in human cultured cells

M. Di Nunzio;A. Bordoni
2018

Abstract

Nowadays the higher nutritional value of whole grains compared to refined grains is recognized. In the last decade, there has been a renewed interest in the ancient wheat varieties for producing high-value food products with enhanced health benefits. This study compared two ancient grains, two heritage grains, and four modern grains grown in the same agronomic conditions considering not only their chemical characteristics, but also their biological effects. Whole grain flours were obtained and used to make bread. Bread was in vitro digested, the digesta were supplemented to HepG2 cells, and the biological effects of supplementation were evaluated. In addition, cells previously supplemented with the different digested bread types were then exposed to inflammatory agents to evidence possible protective effects of the pre-treatments. Despite the impossibility to discriminate bread made with different grains based on their chemical composition, results herein reported evidence that their supplementation to cultured cells exerts different effects, confirming the potential health benefits of ancient grains. This research represents an advancement for the evaluation of the apparent positive effects of ancient grains and the formulation of cereal-based products with added nutritional value.
Ancient wheat; Heritage wheat; Modern wheat; KAMUT® khorasan wheat; Spelt; Cultured cells; Antioxidants; Inflammation.
Settore BIO/10 - Biochimica
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Valli et al_FRI_Text revised II_final.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Post-print, accepted manuscript ecc. (versione accettata dall'editore)
Dimensione 397.51 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
397.51 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
1-s2.0-S096399691830125X-main.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 720.71 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
720.71 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/2434/873286
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 11
  • Scopus 25
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 26
social impact