Objective: To systematically review available evidence to develop guidelines for the prevention of transfusion reactions and monitoring of transfusion administration in dogs and cats. Design: Evidence evaluation of the literature (identified through Medline searches through Pubmed and Google Scholar searches) was carried out for identified transfusion reaction types in dogs and cats. Evidence was evaluated using PICO (Popula- tion, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) questions generated for each reaction type. Evidence was categorized by level of evidence (LOE) and quality (Good, Fair, or Poor). Guidelines for prevention and monitoring were generated based on the synthesis of the evidence. Consensus on the final recommendations and a proposed transfusion administration monitoring form was achieved through Delphi-style surveys. Draft recommendations and the monitoring form were made available through veterinary specialty listservs and comments were incorporated. Results: Twenty-nine guidelines and a transfusion administration monitoring form were formulated from the evidence review with a high degree of consensus Conclusions: This systematic evidence evaluation process yielded recommended pre- vention and monitoring guidelines and a proposed transfusion administration form. However, significant knowledge gaps were identified, demonstrating the need for addi- tional research in veterinary transfusion medicine.

Association of Veterinary Hematology and Transfusion Medicine (AVHTM) Transfusion Reaction Small Animal Consensus Statement (TRACS) Part 2 : Prevention and monitoring / E.B. Davidow, S.L. Blois, I. Goy‐Thollot, L. Harris, K. Humm, S. Musulin, K.J. Nash, A. Odunayo, C.R. Sharp, E. Spada, J. Thomason, J. Walton, K.J. Wardrop. - In: JOURNAL OF VETERINARY EMERGENCY AND CRITICAL CARE. - ISSN 1479-3261. - 31:2(2021), pp. 167-188. [10.1111/vec.13045]

Association of Veterinary Hematology and Transfusion Medicine (AVHTM) Transfusion Reaction Small Animal Consensus Statement (TRACS) Part 2 : Prevention and monitoring

E. Spada
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2021

Abstract

Objective: To systematically review available evidence to develop guidelines for the prevention of transfusion reactions and monitoring of transfusion administration in dogs and cats. Design: Evidence evaluation of the literature (identified through Medline searches through Pubmed and Google Scholar searches) was carried out for identified transfusion reaction types in dogs and cats. Evidence was evaluated using PICO (Popula- tion, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) questions generated for each reaction type. Evidence was categorized by level of evidence (LOE) and quality (Good, Fair, or Poor). Guidelines for prevention and monitoring were generated based on the synthesis of the evidence. Consensus on the final recommendations and a proposed transfusion administration monitoring form was achieved through Delphi-style surveys. Draft recommendations and the monitoring form were made available through veterinary specialty listservs and comments were incorporated. Results: Twenty-nine guidelines and a transfusion administration monitoring form were formulated from the evidence review with a high degree of consensus Conclusions: This systematic evidence evaluation process yielded recommended pre- vention and monitoring guidelines and a proposed transfusion administration form. However, significant knowledge gaps were identified, demonstrating the need for addi- tional research in veterinary transfusion medicine.
English
blood type; crossmatch; pre‐ medication; transfusion reactions
Settore VET/08 - Clinica Medica Veterinaria
Articolo
Comitato scientifico
Pubblicazione scientifica
2021
Wiley Blackwell Publishing
31
2
167
188
22
Pubblicato
Periodico con rilevanza internazionale
crossref
Aderisco
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Association of Veterinary Hematology and Transfusion Medicine (AVHTM) Transfusion Reaction Small Animal Consensus Statement (TRACS) Part 2 : Prevention and monitoring / E.B. Davidow, S.L. Blois, I. Goy‐Thollot, L. Harris, K. Humm, S. Musulin, K.J. Nash, A. Odunayo, C.R. Sharp, E. Spada, J. Thomason, J. Walton, K.J. Wardrop. - In: JOURNAL OF VETERINARY EMERGENCY AND CRITICAL CARE. - ISSN 1479-3261. - 31:2(2021), pp. 167-188. [10.1111/vec.13045]
partially_open
Prodotti della ricerca::01 - Articolo su periodico
13
262
Article (author)
Periodico con Impact Factor
E.B. Davidow, S.L. Blois, I. Goy‐thollot, L. Harris, K. Humm, S. Musulin, K.J. Nash, A. Odunayo, C.R. Sharp, E. Spada, J. Thomason, J. Walton, K.J. Wardrop
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2. Davidow et al. - 2021 - Association of Veterinary Hematology and Transfusion Medicine ( AVHTM ) Transfusion Reaction Small Animal Consensus.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 738.43 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
738.43 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
2.Davidow_et_al_TRACS_Part_Two_12.29.2020.pdf

Open Access dal 11/03/2022

Tipologia: Post-print, accepted manuscript ecc. (versione accettata dall'editore)
Dimensione 560.72 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
560.72 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/822205
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 19
  • Scopus 31
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 25
social impact