The process of proton emission from nuclei is studied by utilizing the two-potential approach of Gurvitz and Kalbermann in the context of the full many-body problem. A time-dependent approach is used for calculating the decay width. Starting from an initial many-body quasistationary state, we employ the Feshbach projection operator approach and reduce the formalism to an effective one-body problem. We show that the decay width can be expressed in terms of a one-body matrix element multiplied by a normalization factor. We demonstrate that the traditional interpretation of this normalization as the square root of a spectroscopic factor is only valid for one particular choice of projection operator. This causes no problem for the calculation of the decay width in a consistent microscopic approach, but it leads to ambiguities in the interpretation of experimental results. In particular, spectroscopic factors extracted from a comparison of the measured decay width with a calculated single-particle width may be affected.
Many-body approach to proton emission and the role of spectroscopic factors / J. Al-Khalili, C. Barbieri, J. Escher, B.K. Jennings, J.-. Sparenberg. - In: PHYSICAL REVIEW. C, NUCLEAR PHYSICS. - ISSN 0556-2813. - 68:2(2003), pp. 024314.1-024314.10.
Many-body approach to proton emission and the role of spectroscopic factors
C. Barbieri;
2003
Abstract
The process of proton emission from nuclei is studied by utilizing the two-potential approach of Gurvitz and Kalbermann in the context of the full many-body problem. A time-dependent approach is used for calculating the decay width. Starting from an initial many-body quasistationary state, we employ the Feshbach projection operator approach and reduce the formalism to an effective one-body problem. We show that the decay width can be expressed in terms of a one-body matrix element multiplied by a normalization factor. We demonstrate that the traditional interpretation of this normalization as the square root of a spectroscopic factor is only valid for one particular choice of projection operator. This causes no problem for the calculation of the decay width in a consistent microscopic approach, but it leads to ambiguities in the interpretation of experimental results. In particular, spectroscopic factors extracted from a comparison of the measured decay width with a calculated single-particle width may be affected.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
PhysRevC_68_024314_2003.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
117.4 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
117.4 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
|
0304055.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore)
Dimensione
288.94 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
288.94 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




