Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified more than 50,000 unique associations with common human traits. While this represents a substantial step forward, establishing the biology underlying these associations has proven extremely difficult. Even determining which cell types and which particular gene(s) are relevant continues to be a challenge. Here, we conduct a cell-specific pathway analysis of the latest GWAS in multiple sclerosis (MS), which had analyzed a total of 47,351 cases and 68,284 healthy controls and found more than 200 non-MHC genome-wide associations. Our analysis identifies pan immune cell as well as cell-specific susceptibility genes in T cells, B cells and monocytes. Finally, genotype-level data from 2,370 patients and 412 controls is used to compute intra-individual and cell-specific susceptibility pathways that offer a biological interpretation of the individual genetic risk to MS. This approach could be adopted in any other complex trait for which genome-wide data is available.

A systems biology approach uncovers cell-specific gene regulatory effects of genetic associations in multiple sclerosis / M. Lohith, N.A. Patsopoulos, C. Chris, S.D. Bos, B. Ashley, M. Jacob, K. Kicheol, J. Xiaoming, S. Adam, S.J. Caillier, T.F.M. Andlauer, L.F. Barcellos, B. Tone, B. Luisa, F. MARTINELLI BONESCHI, D.R. Booth, B. Farren, E.G. Celius, C. Manuel, C. Giancarlo, B.A.C. Cree, D. Sandra, D. Katrina, D. Pierre, D. Efthimios, E. Federica, F. Bertrand, G. Christiane, A. Goris, D. Bénédicte, G. Pierre-Antoine, H. Georgios, H. Jonathan, H. Clive, H. Bernhard, H. Rogier, H. Dana, I. Noriko, K. Seema, K. Jun-ichi, K. Michael, K. Ingrid, C.M. Lill, M.R. Lincoln, L. Felix, M. Roland, O. Annette, P. Aarno, M.A. Pericak-Vance, H. Roland, S. Janna, I. Adrian, O. Tomas, B.V. Taylor, G.J. Stewart, H.F. Harbo, C. Alastair, S.L. Hauser, D.A. Hafler, Z. Frauke, Philip De Jage, S. Stephen, J.R. Oksenberg &, S.E. Baranzini. - In: NATURE COMMUNICATIONS. - ISSN 2041-1723. - 10:1(2019).

A systems biology approach uncovers cell-specific gene regulatory effects of genetic associations in multiple sclerosis

F. MARTINELLI BONESCHI;
2019

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified more than 50,000 unique associations with common human traits. While this represents a substantial step forward, establishing the biology underlying these associations has proven extremely difficult. Even determining which cell types and which particular gene(s) are relevant continues to be a challenge. Here, we conduct a cell-specific pathway analysis of the latest GWAS in multiple sclerosis (MS), which had analyzed a total of 47,351 cases and 68,284 healthy controls and found more than 200 non-MHC genome-wide associations. Our analysis identifies pan immune cell as well as cell-specific susceptibility genes in T cells, B cells and monocytes. Finally, genotype-level data from 2,370 patients and 412 controls is used to compute intra-individual and cell-specific susceptibility pathways that offer a biological interpretation of the individual genetic risk to MS. This approach could be adopted in any other complex trait for which genome-wide data is available.
Genes, Regulator; Genotype; Humans; Multiple Sclerosis; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Systems Biology; Gene Expression Regulation; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Genome-Wide Association Study
Settore MED/26 - Neurologia
2019
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
A systems biology approach uncovers cell-specific gene regulatory effects of genetic associations in multiple sclerosis.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 2.88 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.88 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/663405
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 19
  • Scopus 57
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 56
social impact