In this paper, I inquire into the concept of paranomy (hinted at by Georg Henrik von Wright and developed by Amedeo Giovanni Conte) by distinguishing four kinds of paranomy. The main question of the paper is: how can worldly situations determine an incompatibility between two norms that are not in an antinomic relation? What are the ways of normative incompatibility due to the Sein? In order to address these questions, I inquiry into four different ways in which the Sein can make the norms interact, determining incompatibilities between them. These four ways determine four kinds of paranomy.
Quattro tipi di paranomia [Four kinds of paranomy] / G. Feis. - In: MATERIALI PER UNA STORIA DELLA CULTURA GIURIDICA. - ISSN 1120-9607. - 48:1(2018), pp. 115-140. [10.1436/89560]
Quattro tipi di paranomia [Four kinds of paranomy]
G. Feis
2018
Abstract
In this paper, I inquire into the concept of paranomy (hinted at by Georg Henrik von Wright and developed by Amedeo Giovanni Conte) by distinguishing four kinds of paranomy. The main question of the paper is: how can worldly situations determine an incompatibility between two norms that are not in an antinomic relation? What are the ways of normative incompatibility due to the Sein? In order to address these questions, I inquiry into four different ways in which the Sein can make the norms interact, determining incompatibilities between them. These four ways determine four kinds of paranomy.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
1120-9607-27659-5.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
254.02 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
254.02 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.