In this paper, I inquire into the concept of paranomy (hinted at by Georg Henrik von Wright and developed by Amedeo Giovanni Conte) by distinguishing four kinds of paranomy. The main question of the paper is: how can worldly situations determine an incompatibility between two norms that are not in an antinomic relation? What are the ways of normative incompatibility due to the Sein? In order to address these questions, I inquiry into four different ways in which the Sein can make the norms interact, determining incompatibilities between them. These four ways determine four kinds of paranomy.
Quattro tipi di paranomia [Four kinds of paranomy] / G. Feis. - In: MATERIALI PER UNA STORIA DELLA CULTURA GIURIDICA. - ISSN 1120-9607. - 48:1(2018), pp. 115-140.
Titolo: | Quattro tipi di paranomia [Four kinds of paranomy] |
Autori: | |
Parole Chiave: | Amedeo Giovanni Conte; Georg Henrik von Wright; Indirect incompatibility; Normative incompatibility; Paranomy; Sociology and Political Science; Law |
Settore Scientifico Disciplinare: | Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia del Diritto |
Data di pubblicazione: | 2018 |
Rivista: | |
Tipologia: | Article (author) |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): | http://dx.doi.org/10.1436/89560 |
Appare nelle tipologie: | 01 - Articolo su periodico |
File in questo prodotto:
File | Descrizione | Tipologia | Licenza | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1120-9607-27659-5.pdf | Publisher's version/PDF | Administrator Richiedi una copia |