Purpose The development of new computer-assisted navigation technologies in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has attracted great interest; however, the debate remains open as to the real reliability of these systems. We compared conventional TKA with last generation computer-navigated TKA to find out if navigation can reach better radiographic and clinical outcomes. Methods Twenty patients with tricompartmental knee osteoarthritis were prospectively selected for conventional TKA (n = 10) or last generation computer-navigated TKA (n = 10). Data regarding age, gender, operated side, and previous surgery were collected. All 20 patients received the same cemented posterior-stabilized TKA. The same surgical instrumentation, including alignment and cutting guides, was used for both the techniques. A single radiologist assessed mechanical alignment and tibial slope before and after surgery. A single orthopaedic surgeon performed clinical evaluation at 1 year after the surgery. Wilcoxon’s test was used to compare the outcomes of the two groups. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results No significant differences in mechanical axis or tibial slope was found between the two groups. The clinical outcome was equally good with both techniques. At a mean follow-up of 15.5 months (range, 13–25 months), all patients from both groups were generally satisfied with a full return to daily activities and without a significance difference between them. Conclusion Our data showed that clinical and radiological outcomes of TKA were not improved by the use of computer-assisted instruments, and that the elevated costs of the system are not warranted. Level of Evidence This is a Level II, randomized clinical trial.

Conventional versus smart wireless navigation in total knee replacement: Similar outcomes in a randomized prospective study / M. Denti, F. Soldati, F. Bartolucci, E. Morenghi, L. De Girolamo, P. Randelli. - In: JOINTS. - ISSN 2282-4324. - 6:2(2018), pp. 90-94. [10.1055/s-0038-1660813]

Conventional versus smart wireless navigation in total knee replacement: Similar outcomes in a randomized prospective study

Morenghi, Emanuela;De Girolamo, Laura;Randelli, Pietro
2018

Abstract

Purpose The development of new computer-assisted navigation technologies in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has attracted great interest; however, the debate remains open as to the real reliability of these systems. We compared conventional TKA with last generation computer-navigated TKA to find out if navigation can reach better radiographic and clinical outcomes. Methods Twenty patients with tricompartmental knee osteoarthritis were prospectively selected for conventional TKA (n = 10) or last generation computer-navigated TKA (n = 10). Data regarding age, gender, operated side, and previous surgery were collected. All 20 patients received the same cemented posterior-stabilized TKA. The same surgical instrumentation, including alignment and cutting guides, was used for both the techniques. A single radiologist assessed mechanical alignment and tibial slope before and after surgery. A single orthopaedic surgeon performed clinical evaluation at 1 year after the surgery. Wilcoxon’s test was used to compare the outcomes of the two groups. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results No significant differences in mechanical axis or tibial slope was found between the two groups. The clinical outcome was equally good with both techniques. At a mean follow-up of 15.5 months (range, 13–25 months), all patients from both groups were generally satisfied with a full return to daily activities and without a significance difference between them. Conclusion Our data showed that clinical and radiological outcomes of TKA were not improved by the use of computer-assisted instruments, and that the elevated costs of the system are not warranted. Level of Evidence This is a Level II, randomized clinical trial.
computer-assisted; limb alignment; navigation; smart wireless; total knee arthroplasty
Settore MED/33 - Malattie Apparato Locomotore
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
JOINTS-1700041.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Post-print, accepted manuscript ecc. (versione accettata dall'editore)
Dimensione 3.31 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.31 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
10-1055-s-0038-1660813.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 221.84 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
221.84 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/2434/643459
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact