Considering the uncertainty of measurement (UOM) when assessing compliance with reference values given in compositional specifications and statutory limits is still a controversial matter. In theory, assessing compliance requires considering both type I (false positive) and type II (false negative) errors. The more the concentration of the analyte in the sample under investigation is close to the allowed concentration limit, the more considering both types of errors is critical. This paper describes how this could be done. The matter is discussed in the light of the most recent literature information.
The assessment of compliance with legal limits, Part 2 : How to consider both type I and type II errors when working in the concentration domain / E. Desimoni, B. Brunetti, R. Cattaneo. - In: ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE. - ISSN 0949-1775. - 9:8(2004), pp. 445-449. [10.1007/s00769-003-0753-2]
The assessment of compliance with legal limits, Part 2 : How to consider both type I and type II errors when working in the concentration domain
E. DesimoniPrimo
;B. BrunettiSecondo
;
2004
Abstract
Considering the uncertainty of measurement (UOM) when assessing compliance with reference values given in compositional specifications and statutory limits is still a controversial matter. In theory, assessing compliance requires considering both type I (false positive) and type II (false negative) errors. The more the concentration of the analyte in the sample under investigation is close to the allowed concentration limit, the more considering both types of errors is critical. This paper describes how this could be done. The matter is discussed in the light of the most recent literature information.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.