Aims: Long-term comparisons between bariatric surgical techniques have been performed for gastric bypass (RYGB), sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), and biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) vs gastric banding (LAGB), but short-term studies (6 months–4 years) have only compared biliointestinal bypass (BIBP) and LAGB. The participating institutions regularly perform both BIBP and LAGB with a common protocol, and the aim of this retrospective study was to compare long-term effects of the two procedures on body weight, on clinical and metabolic variables, and on resolution of obesity and of diabetes. Methods: All procedures performed between 01/01/1998 and 31/12/2005 were considered; 73 out of 91 patients undergoing BIBP, and 154 out of 249 patients undergoing LAGB were evaluable up to 9 years. Results: BIBP was significantly more effective than LAGB in terms of weight loss and of resolution of obesity (BMI < 30 kg/m2), in terms of decrease of systolic blood pressure and of serum cholesterol, and similar in terms of resolution of diabetes. In addition, the effect of BIBP was stable, while the effect of LAGB decreased with time. Conclusions: Both BIBP and LAGB exert long-term effects on body weight, on blood pressure, and on resolution of diabetes mellitus; the effect of BIBP is significantly greater than the effect of LAGB in terms of weight loss, resolution of obesity, of control of systolic blood pressure and of serum cholesterol, but not in terms of resolution of diabetes.

A 9 years comparison of weight loss, disappearance of obesity, and resolution of diabetes mellitus with biliointestinal bypass and with adjustable gastric banding: experience of a collaborative network / A.E. Pontiroli, A.S. Zakaria, G. Micheletto, C. Osio, A. Saibene, F. Folli. - In: ACTA DIABETOLOGICA. - ISSN 0940-5429. - (2018). [Epub ahead of print]

A 9 years comparison of weight loss, disappearance of obesity, and resolution of diabetes mellitus with biliointestinal bypass and with adjustable gastric banding: experience of a collaborative network

A.E. Pontiroli
Primo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
G. Micheletto
Writing – Review & Editing
;
C. Osio
Data Curation
;
F. Folli
Ultimo
Writing – Review & Editing
2018

Abstract

Aims: Long-term comparisons between bariatric surgical techniques have been performed for gastric bypass (RYGB), sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), and biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) vs gastric banding (LAGB), but short-term studies (6 months–4 years) have only compared biliointestinal bypass (BIBP) and LAGB. The participating institutions regularly perform both BIBP and LAGB with a common protocol, and the aim of this retrospective study was to compare long-term effects of the two procedures on body weight, on clinical and metabolic variables, and on resolution of obesity and of diabetes. Methods: All procedures performed between 01/01/1998 and 31/12/2005 were considered; 73 out of 91 patients undergoing BIBP, and 154 out of 249 patients undergoing LAGB were evaluable up to 9 years. Results: BIBP was significantly more effective than LAGB in terms of weight loss and of resolution of obesity (BMI < 30 kg/m2), in terms of decrease of systolic blood pressure and of serum cholesterol, and similar in terms of resolution of diabetes. In addition, the effect of BIBP was stable, while the effect of LAGB decreased with time. Conclusions: Both BIBP and LAGB exert long-term effects on body weight, on blood pressure, and on resolution of diabetes mellitus; the effect of BIBP is significantly greater than the effect of LAGB in terms of weight loss, resolution of obesity, of control of systolic blood pressure and of serum cholesterol, but not in terms of resolution of diabetes.
Adjustable gastric banding; Bariatric surgery; Biliointestinal bypass; Diabetes mellitus; Obesity; Resolution of diabetes mellitus; Resolution of obesity
Settore MED/09 - Medicina Interna
2018
9-nov-2018
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Pontiroli2018_Article_A9YearsComparisonOfWeightLossD.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.13 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.13 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/601200
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact