The article aims to analyze the history of the reception of Theorema Egregium in the time span between the publication of Gauss’s Disquisitiones and about 1870. Some contributions by Liouville, Bertrand, Puiseux, Chelini, Brioschi and Beltrami are carefully analyzed, by showing how the authors proposed to demonstrate this fundamental result of surface theory in a manner that highlighted its geometric content in a more satisfactory way than Gauss’s original treatment. In actual fact, most part of the ideas underlying these reformulations was already contained in the research (private and published only posthu- mously) of Gauss. Curiously, the history of the reception of Theorema Egregium in the period considered was littered with attempts, certainly unaware, to rediscover demonstrations and procedures that Gauss had deemed inadequate and that he had definitively discarded when drafting the text of the Disquisitiones. As will be shown, the reception of Gauss’s ideas produced a fruitful and in-depth debate concerning the methods and techniques that should be considered most suitable to deal with problems in the realm of the theory of surfaces.

Sulla ricezione del Theorema Egregium, 1828-1868 / A. Cogliati. - In: BOLLETTINO DI STORIA DELLE SCIENZE MATEMATICHE. - ISSN 1724-1650. - 38:1(2018), pp. 31-60. [Epub ahead of print] [10.19272/201809201002]

Sulla ricezione del Theorema Egregium, 1828-1868

A. Cogliati
2018

Abstract

The article aims to analyze the history of the reception of Theorema Egregium in the time span between the publication of Gauss’s Disquisitiones and about 1870. Some contributions by Liouville, Bertrand, Puiseux, Chelini, Brioschi and Beltrami are carefully analyzed, by showing how the authors proposed to demonstrate this fundamental result of surface theory in a manner that highlighted its geometric content in a more satisfactory way than Gauss’s original treatment. In actual fact, most part of the ideas underlying these reformulations was already contained in the research (private and published only posthu- mously) of Gauss. Curiously, the history of the reception of Theorema Egregium in the period considered was littered with attempts, certainly unaware, to rediscover demonstrations and procedures that Gauss had deemed inadequate and that he had definitively discarded when drafting the text of the Disquisitiones. As will be shown, the reception of Gauss’s ideas produced a fruitful and in-depth debate concerning the methods and techniques that should be considered most suitable to deal with problems in the realm of the theory of surfaces.
Settore MAT/04 - Matematiche Complementari
2018
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Cogliati_2bozze.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Post-print, accepted manuscript ecc. (versione accettata dall'editore)
Dimensione 292.52 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
292.52 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/576820
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact