The diagnosis of Learning Disabilities (LD) is frequently subject to cognitive biases. In Italy, minimal diagnostic standards have been identified during a national Consensus Conference (2010). However, specialists use different protocols to assess reading and cognitive abilities. Thus, we propose to support LDs diagnosis with Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). Clinical results from 203 reports were input to investigate which ones can predict LD diagnosis. In addition, correlations among LDs were explored. Preliminary results show that ANNs can be useful to support a clinical diagnosis of LDs with an 81.93% average accuracy, and, under certain conditions, with a 99% certainty. Additionally, the 10 most meaningful tests for each LD have been identified and significant correlations between dyscalculia and dyslexia were found.

How many tests do you need to diagnose learning disabilities? / Y. Vezzoli, R. Folgieri, M.E. Vanutelli, C. Lucchiari. - In: NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TRENDS. - ISSN 1970-321X. - 2018:23(2018 Apr), pp. 67-81.

How many tests do you need to diagnose learning disabilities?

R. Folgieri;M.E. Vanutelli;C. Lucchiari
2018

Abstract

The diagnosis of Learning Disabilities (LD) is frequently subject to cognitive biases. In Italy, minimal diagnostic standards have been identified during a national Consensus Conference (2010). However, specialists use different protocols to assess reading and cognitive abilities. Thus, we propose to support LDs diagnosis with Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). Clinical results from 203 reports were input to investigate which ones can predict LD diagnosis. In addition, correlations among LDs were explored. Preliminary results show that ANNs can be useful to support a clinical diagnosis of LDs with an 81.93% average accuracy, and, under certain conditions, with a 99% certainty. Additionally, the 10 most meaningful tests for each LD have been identified and significant correlations between dyscalculia and dyslexia were found.
learning disabilities; artificial neural networks; dyslexia
Settore M-PSI/01 - Psicologia Generale
Settore INF/01 - Informatica
apr-2018
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
NeuropsychologicalTrends-2018_23_03.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 313.69 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
313.69 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/572114
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact