We report that the 2 fluorescein (FITC) conjugated CD34 monoclonal antibodies available to date, namely FITC-8G12 and FITC-QBEND10, exhibit different capabilities of detecting circulating hematopoietic progenitors (CHP) as cells expressing the CD34 antigen (CD34+) by direct immunofluorescence flow cytometry. Mean fluorescence intensity conferred by FITC-QBEND10 to CD34+ CHP is 2.8-4.3 times lower than that conferred by FITC-8G12. By indirect immunofluorescence, native unconjugated QBEND10 and 8G12 antibodies detect CD34+ CHP in a comparable manner, thus indicating that the decrease in QBEND10 affinity is due to FITC-conjugation. Utilization of FITC-QBEND10 instead of FICT-8G12 to estimate infrequent (usually less than or equal to 5%) CD34+ CHP for clinical decision-making in autologous transplantation of CHP exposes clinicians to the risk of either overestimating (false positive) or underestimating (false negative) these cells in peripheral blood. Recently published guidelines for large-scale collection of CHP for autologous transplantation in cancer patients were based on data obtained with FITC-8G12. The same guidelines cannot be considered valid if FITC-QBEND10 is employed. We recommend FITC-8G12 as the optimal reagent to date for standardizing results of autologous CHP transplantation in cancer therapy.

Flow cytometry to estimate circulating hematopoietic progenitors for autologous transplantation: comparative analysis of different CD34 monoclonal antibodies / S. Siena, M. Bregni, B. Brando, N. Belli, P.M. Lansdorp, G. Bonadonna, M. Gianni. - In: HAEMATOLOGICA. - ISSN 0390-6078. - 76:4(1991), pp. 330-333.

Flow cytometry to estimate circulating hematopoietic progenitors for autologous transplantation: comparative analysis of different CD34 monoclonal antibodies

S. Siena
Primo
;
1991

Abstract

We report that the 2 fluorescein (FITC) conjugated CD34 monoclonal antibodies available to date, namely FITC-8G12 and FITC-QBEND10, exhibit different capabilities of detecting circulating hematopoietic progenitors (CHP) as cells expressing the CD34 antigen (CD34+) by direct immunofluorescence flow cytometry. Mean fluorescence intensity conferred by FITC-QBEND10 to CD34+ CHP is 2.8-4.3 times lower than that conferred by FITC-8G12. By indirect immunofluorescence, native unconjugated QBEND10 and 8G12 antibodies detect CD34+ CHP in a comparable manner, thus indicating that the decrease in QBEND10 affinity is due to FITC-conjugation. Utilization of FITC-QBEND10 instead of FICT-8G12 to estimate infrequent (usually less than or equal to 5%) CD34+ CHP for clinical decision-making in autologous transplantation of CHP exposes clinicians to the risk of either overestimating (false positive) or underestimating (false negative) these cells in peripheral blood. Recently published guidelines for large-scale collection of CHP for autologous transplantation in cancer patients were based on data obtained with FITC-8G12. The same guidelines cannot be considered valid if FITC-QBEND10 is employed. We recommend FITC-8G12 as the optimal reagent to date for standardizing results of autologous CHP transplantation in cancer therapy.
Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibody Specificity; Antigens, CD; Antigens, CD34; Blood Cell Count; Blood Transfusion, Autologous; Breast Neoplasms; Cell Separation; Fluorescein-5-isothiocyanate; Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Interleukin-3; Predictive Value of Tests; Recombinant Proteins; Flow Cytometry; Fluorescent Antibody Technique; Hematopoietic Stem Cells
Settore MED/06 - Oncologia Medica
1991
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1991 Siena et al Haematologica.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 72.76 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
72.76 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/552929
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 37
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 41
social impact