Today the problem about the best way to manage peripheral arterial disease (PAD) remains unresolved. Infrainguinal bypass has been the gold standard treatment for patients presenting with critical limb ischemia, defined as ischemic chronic rest pain, ulcers, or tissue loss. Critical limb occlusions (CTOs) of the femoro-popliteal and trifurcation vessels are classified as TASC II type C and D lesions where surgical revascularization is traditionally the treatment of choice. Particularly vein bypass remains the "optimum" against which, any infrainguinal arterial reconstruction technique for superficial femoral artery (SFA) occlusion, should challenge. Great progress has been made in the endovascular treatment of the SFA, that has led to a recent development of subintimal technique, re-entry devices, a more aggressive approach for treating peripheral artery disease and more flexible, long nitinol stents. Thus the advent of new endovascular techniques and devices has changed the landscape of vascular intervention allowing these lesions to be treated by endovascular means with rates of more than 90% for TASC II C and D lesions. If done appropriately, endovascular revascularization of aortoiliac and femoro-popliteal CTOs, successful or not, should not prevent the ability to perform subsequent surgical revascularization. Many trials and review have been analyzed for every technique described in this paper with the aim to analyze the current status of endovascular technique trying to clarify which could be the best endovascular way to treat this class of lesions.

Percutaneous endovascular treatment of long femoro-popliteal arterial occlusion : A review of the literature / F. Piacentino, E. Duka, A.M. Ierardi, C. Floridi, F. Fontana, M. Petrillo, G. Piffaretti, P. Castelli, G. Carrafiello. - In: ITALIAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY. - ISSN 1824-4777. - 21:3(2014), pp. 125-138.

Percutaneous endovascular treatment of long femoro-popliteal arterial occlusion : A review of the literature

C. Floridi;G. Carrafiello
2014

Abstract

Today the problem about the best way to manage peripheral arterial disease (PAD) remains unresolved. Infrainguinal bypass has been the gold standard treatment for patients presenting with critical limb ischemia, defined as ischemic chronic rest pain, ulcers, or tissue loss. Critical limb occlusions (CTOs) of the femoro-popliteal and trifurcation vessels are classified as TASC II type C and D lesions where surgical revascularization is traditionally the treatment of choice. Particularly vein bypass remains the "optimum" against which, any infrainguinal arterial reconstruction technique for superficial femoral artery (SFA) occlusion, should challenge. Great progress has been made in the endovascular treatment of the SFA, that has led to a recent development of subintimal technique, re-entry devices, a more aggressive approach for treating peripheral artery disease and more flexible, long nitinol stents. Thus the advent of new endovascular techniques and devices has changed the landscape of vascular intervention allowing these lesions to be treated by endovascular means with rates of more than 90% for TASC II C and D lesions. If done appropriately, endovascular revascularization of aortoiliac and femoro-popliteal CTOs, successful or not, should not prevent the ability to perform subsequent surgical revascularization. Many trials and review have been analyzed for every technique described in this paper with the aim to analyze the current status of endovascular technique trying to clarify which could be the best endovascular way to treat this class of lesions.
endovascular procedures; femoral artery; interventional; radiology
Settore MED/36 - Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia
2014
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84929910392&partnerID=40&md5=151bf26db9b41f472f2ef8feeb02c930
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/432459
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact