The authors analyze and discuss two of the most recent ECtHR judgments on transgenders’ rights under the European Convention: Hämäläinen v. Finland (2014) and Y.Y. v. Turkey (2015). Throughout an in depth investigation of the circumstances of the cases, as well as of the assessments of the European Court, the authors aim at illustrating the ECtHR’s renunciation of fully enforcing transgenders’ right to family life by endorsing a traditional concept of marriage and by making a deceptive use of the consensus argument.
LGBT rights and the way forward: the evolution of the case law of the ECtHR in relation to transgender individuals’ identity / M.E. D'Amico, C. Nardocci. - In: ERA-FORUM. - ISSN 1612-3093. - 17:2(2016), pp. 191-202. [10.1007/s12027-016-0431-6]
LGBT rights and the way forward: the evolution of the case law of the ECtHR in relation to transgender individuals’ identity
M.E. D'AmicoPrimo
;C. NardocciUltimo
2016
Abstract
The authors analyze and discuss two of the most recent ECtHR judgments on transgenders’ rights under the European Convention: Hämäläinen v. Finland (2014) and Y.Y. v. Turkey (2015). Throughout an in depth investigation of the circumstances of the cases, as well as of the assessments of the European Court, the authors aim at illustrating the ECtHR’s renunciation of fully enforcing transgenders’ right to family life by endorsing a traditional concept of marriage and by making a deceptive use of the consensus argument.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
art%3A10.1007%2Fs12027-016-0431-6.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
668.04 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
668.04 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.