BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hypercoagulability increases the risk of arterial thrombosis; however, this effect may differ between various manifestations of arterial disease. METHODS: In this study, we compared the effect of coagulation factors as measures of hypercoagulability on the risk of ischaemic stroke (IS) and myocardial infarction (MI) by performing a systematic review of the literature. The effect of a risk factor on IS (relative risk for IS, RRIS) was compared with the effect on MI (RRMI) by calculating their ratio (RRR = RRIS/RRMI). A relevant differential effect was considered when RRR was >1+ its own standard error (SE) or <1-SE. RESULTS: We identified 70 publications, describing results from 31 study populations, accounting for 351 markers of hypercoagulability. The majority (203/351, 58%) had an RRR greater than 1. A larger effect on IS risk than MI risk (RRE>1+1SE) was found in 49/343 (14%) markers. Of these, 18/49 (37%) had an RRR greater than 1+2SE. On the opposite side, a larger effect on MI risk (RRR<1-1SE) was found in only 17/343 (5%) markers. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that hypercoagulability has a more pronounced effect on the risk of IS than that of MI.

Hypercoagulability Is a Stronger Risk Factor for Ischaemic Stroke than for Myocardial Infarction : a Systematic Review / A. Maino, F.R. Rosendaal, A. Algra, F. Peyvandi, B. Siegerink. - In: PLOS ONE. - ISSN 1932-6203. - 10:8(2015 Aug 07), pp. e0133523.1-e0133523.12. [10.1371/journal.pone.0133523]

Hypercoagulability Is a Stronger Risk Factor for Ischaemic Stroke than for Myocardial Infarction : a Systematic Review

A. Maino
Primo
;
F. Peyvandi
Penultimo
;
2015

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hypercoagulability increases the risk of arterial thrombosis; however, this effect may differ between various manifestations of arterial disease. METHODS: In this study, we compared the effect of coagulation factors as measures of hypercoagulability on the risk of ischaemic stroke (IS) and myocardial infarction (MI) by performing a systematic review of the literature. The effect of a risk factor on IS (relative risk for IS, RRIS) was compared with the effect on MI (RRMI) by calculating their ratio (RRR = RRIS/RRMI). A relevant differential effect was considered when RRR was >1+ its own standard error (SE) or <1-SE. RESULTS: We identified 70 publications, describing results from 31 study populations, accounting for 351 markers of hypercoagulability. The majority (203/351, 58%) had an RRR greater than 1. A larger effect on IS risk than MI risk (RRE>1+1SE) was found in 49/343 (14%) markers. Of these, 18/49 (37%) had an RRR greater than 1+2SE. On the opposite side, a larger effect on MI risk (RRR<1-1SE) was found in only 17/343 (5%) markers. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that hypercoagulability has a more pronounced effect on the risk of IS than that of MI.
English
Biomarkers; Brain Ischemia; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thrombophilia; Thrombosis
Settore MED/09 - Medicina Interna
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Ricerca di base
Pubblicazione scientifica
7-ago-2015
Public Library of Science
10
8
e0133523
1
12
12
Pubblicato
Periodico con rilevanza internazionale
pubmed
crossref
Aderisco
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Hypercoagulability Is a Stronger Risk Factor for Ischaemic Stroke than for Myocardial Infarction : a Systematic Review / A. Maino, F.R. Rosendaal, A. Algra, F. Peyvandi, B. Siegerink. - In: PLOS ONE. - ISSN 1932-6203. - 10:8(2015 Aug 07), pp. e0133523.1-e0133523.12. [10.1371/journal.pone.0133523]
open
Prodotti della ricerca::01 - Articolo su periodico
5
262
Article (author)
no
A. Maino, F.R. Rosendaal, A. Algra, F. Peyvandi, B. Siegerink
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Maino A, Plos ONE 2015_Hypercoagulability Is a Stronger Risk Factor.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 443.6 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
443.6 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/429876
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 17
  • Scopus 45
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 42
social impact