Total scattering data of nanocrystalline gahnite (ZnAl2O4, 2-3 nm) have been collected with three of the most commonly used instruments: (i) ID31 high-resolution diffractometer at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) (Qmax = 22 Å-1); (ii) ID11 high-energy beamline at the ESRF (Qmax = 26.6 Å-1); and (iii) Empyrean laboratory diffractometer by PANalytical with molybdenum anode X-ray tube (Qmax = 17.1 Å-1). Pair distribution functions (PDFs) for each instrument data-set have been obtained, changing some of the parameters, by PDFgetX3 software, with the aim of testing the software in the treatment of different total scattering data. The material under analysis has been chosen for its nanometric (and possibly disordered) nature, to give rise to a challenge for all the diffractometers involved. None of the latter should have a clear advantage. The PDF and F(Q) functions have been visually compared, and then the three PDF sets have been used for refinements by means of PDFgui suite. All the refinements have been made exactly in the same way for the sake of a fair comparison. Small differences could be observed in the experimental PDFs and the derived results, but none of them seemed to be significant.

Comparison of total scattering data from various sources : The case of a nanometric spinel / G. Confalonieri, M. Dapiaggi, M. Sommariva, M. Gateshki, A.N. Fitch, A. Bernasconi. - In: POWDER DIFFRACTION. - ISSN 0885-7156. - 30:S1(2015 May 01), pp. S65-S69. [10.1017/S0885715614001389]

Comparison of total scattering data from various sources : The case of a nanometric spinel

G. Confalonieri
;
M. Dapiaggi
Secondo
;
A. Bernasconi
Ultimo
2015

Abstract

Total scattering data of nanocrystalline gahnite (ZnAl2O4, 2-3 nm) have been collected with three of the most commonly used instruments: (i) ID31 high-resolution diffractometer at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) (Qmax = 22 Å-1); (ii) ID11 high-energy beamline at the ESRF (Qmax = 26.6 Å-1); and (iii) Empyrean laboratory diffractometer by PANalytical with molybdenum anode X-ray tube (Qmax = 17.1 Å-1). Pair distribution functions (PDFs) for each instrument data-set have been obtained, changing some of the parameters, by PDFgetX3 software, with the aim of testing the software in the treatment of different total scattering data. The material under analysis has been chosen for its nanometric (and possibly disordered) nature, to give rise to a challenge for all the diffractometers involved. None of the latter should have a clear advantage. The PDF and F(Q) functions have been visually compared, and then the three PDF sets have been used for refinements by means of PDFgui suite. All the refinements have been made exactly in the same way for the sake of a fair comparison. Small differences could be observed in the experimental PDFs and the derived results, but none of them seemed to be significant.
laboratory diffractometer; nanomaterials; PDF; synchrotron; total scattering; Materials Science (all); Condensed Matter Physics; Instrumentation; Radiation
Settore GEO/06 - Mineralogia
1-mag-2015
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
comparison_of_total_scattering_data_from_various_sources_the_case_of_a_nanometric_spinel.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 374.69 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
374.69 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/350011
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 14
social impact