OBJECTIVE: To determinate the efficacy of "polytherapy", a surgical technique that utilize all the components of the diamond concept (mesenchymal stem cells, bone morphogenetic proteins and scaffold) versus a "monotherapy", a surgical technique that utilize only one component of the diamond conceptin the treatment of severe forearm non-unions. METHODS: We studied a database of 52 patients with 52 forearm non-unions; we classified the patients with the NUSS SCORE and we divided the patients in two group according to the treatment received. So we distinguished a group of patients treated according to the principles of "monotherapy" (33 patients) and a group of patients treated according to the principles of "polytherapy" (19 patients). The minimum follow up was 12 months. RESULTS: In the monotherapy group 21/33 non-unions (63.64%) went on to develop a radiographic and clinical healing within a period of 12 months, the calculated DASH SCORE showed a mean value of 55.15 points. In the polytherapy group 17/19 (89.47%) nonunions went on to develop clinical and radiographic healing within 12 months, and the average DASH score showed a mean value of 45.47 points. CONCLUSION: The polytherapy technique with the use of recombinant morphogenetic proteins, autologous MSCs and scaffold in the same surgical time appears to be an effective treatment for patients with severe forearm non-unions.

Monotherapy vs. polytherapy in the treatment of forearm non-unions and bone defects / G. M. Calori, G.V. Mineo, E. Mazza, S. Mazzola, N. Marelli, M. Colombo. - In: INJURY. - ISSN 0020-1383. - 44:suppl. 1(2013 Jan), pp. S63-S69. [10.1016/S0020-1383(13)70015-9]

Monotherapy vs. polytherapy in the treatment of forearm non-unions and bone defects

G.V. Mineo;
2013

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determinate the efficacy of "polytherapy", a surgical technique that utilize all the components of the diamond concept (mesenchymal stem cells, bone morphogenetic proteins and scaffold) versus a "monotherapy", a surgical technique that utilize only one component of the diamond conceptin the treatment of severe forearm non-unions. METHODS: We studied a database of 52 patients with 52 forearm non-unions; we classified the patients with the NUSS SCORE and we divided the patients in two group according to the treatment received. So we distinguished a group of patients treated according to the principles of "monotherapy" (33 patients) and a group of patients treated according to the principles of "polytherapy" (19 patients). The minimum follow up was 12 months. RESULTS: In the monotherapy group 21/33 non-unions (63.64%) went on to develop a radiographic and clinical healing within a period of 12 months, the calculated DASH SCORE showed a mean value of 55.15 points. In the polytherapy group 17/19 (89.47%) nonunions went on to develop clinical and radiographic healing within 12 months, and the average DASH score showed a mean value of 45.47 points. CONCLUSION: The polytherapy technique with the use of recombinant morphogenetic proteins, autologous MSCs and scaffold in the same surgical time appears to be an effective treatment for patients with severe forearm non-unions.
Forearm; Non-unions; Mesenchymal stem cells; Bone defects; Bone morphogenetic proteins; Polytherapy; Monotherapy; Biological chamber; Delayed union; Scaffold; NUSS score
Settore MED/33 - Malattie Apparato Locomotore
gen-2013
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
MONOTHERAPY VS POLITHERAPY SCOPUS.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.94 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.94 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/239251
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 12
  • Scopus 37
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 37
social impact