To assess the role of diet and the risk of gastric cancer (GC), we conducted a systemic review of the literature through Medline and Embase databases, and a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies evaluating the association between dietary patterns and gastric cancer risk. Of the 16 papers identified, 9 derived dietary patterns through an a posteriori method, 5 through a priori scores, and 2 used both approaches. Among the studies based on a posteriori dietary patterns, the RRs for overall GC ranged from 0.4 to 0.6 for the favorable ones, and from 1.7 to 3.0 for the unfavorable ones; among the studies based on a priori dietary patterns, the RRs for overall GC ranged from 0.2 to 0.7 for favorable ones, and from 1.8 to 6.9, plus an outlier RR of 41.2, for the unfavorable ones, for the highest versus the lowest category. Of these studies, 8 were included in our meta-analysis, as they provide a similar method to derive dietary patterns. A favourable role on GC emerged for the “Prudent/healthy”, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.75 (95% confidence intervals, CI: 0.63-0.90), for the highest versus the lowest category. Similar results emerged by anatomical subtype. An unfavourable role on GC emerged for the “Western/unhealthy” dietary pattern, with an OR=1.51 (95% CI: 1.21-1.89). This association was weaker for the distal/NOS (not otherwise specified) category (OR=1.36) compared to the cardia GC (OR=2.05)

Dietary patterns and gastric cancer risk : a sistematic review and meta-analysis / V. Rosato. ((Intervento presentato al 9. convegno La Statistica nelle Scienze della Vita e dell'Ambiente tenutosi a Bressanone (BZ) nel 2013.

Dietary patterns and gastric cancer risk : a sistematic review and meta-analysis

V. Rosato
Primo
2013

Abstract

To assess the role of diet and the risk of gastric cancer (GC), we conducted a systemic review of the literature through Medline and Embase databases, and a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies evaluating the association between dietary patterns and gastric cancer risk. Of the 16 papers identified, 9 derived dietary patterns through an a posteriori method, 5 through a priori scores, and 2 used both approaches. Among the studies based on a posteriori dietary patterns, the RRs for overall GC ranged from 0.4 to 0.6 for the favorable ones, and from 1.7 to 3.0 for the unfavorable ones; among the studies based on a priori dietary patterns, the RRs for overall GC ranged from 0.2 to 0.7 for favorable ones, and from 1.8 to 6.9, plus an outlier RR of 41.2, for the unfavorable ones, for the highest versus the lowest category. Of these studies, 8 were included in our meta-analysis, as they provide a similar method to derive dietary patterns. A favourable role on GC emerged for the “Prudent/healthy”, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.75 (95% confidence intervals, CI: 0.63-0.90), for the highest versus the lowest category. Similar results emerged by anatomical subtype. An unfavourable role on GC emerged for the “Western/unhealthy” dietary pattern, with an OR=1.51 (95% CI: 1.21-1.89). This association was weaker for the distal/NOS (not otherwise specified) category (OR=1.36) compared to the cardia GC (OR=2.05)
27-giu-2013
dietary patterns ; gastric cancer ; meta-analysis ; review
Settore MED/01 - Statistica Medica
International Biometric Society - Italian Region
Società Italiana di Biometria (SIB)
Dietary patterns and gastric cancer risk : a sistematic review and meta-analysis / V. Rosato. ((Intervento presentato al 9. convegno La Statistica nelle Scienze della Vita e dell'Ambiente tenutosi a Bressanone (BZ) nel 2013.
Conference Object
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Rosato Valentina SIB 2013.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore)
Dimensione 83.73 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
83.73 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/222551
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact