SUMMARY - 1. Introduction: the conflict between national security and transparency – Part one 2. The Italian law about state secret - 2.1. The leading case of 1977: national security as a constitutional foundation, and limit of state secret - 2.2. The effects of resorting to state secret before the judicial power: an “almost total” barrier to the criminal suit - 2.3. Secrecy is not breached although the records it regards have already been disclosed - 2.4. The oversight of the Italian constitutional Court in respect to the political nature of secrecy - 2.4.1. Considerations on the limits of subversion of the constitutional order for the use of state secrets and on the requirement of justifying the secrecy order - 2.5. Final considerations – Part two 3. The United States’ system: state secrets privilege and oversight of the judicial power - 4. The viewpoint of the European Court of Human Rights - 4.1. Secrecy and human rights in the ECHR’S jurisprudence - 5. Conclusions -
Transparency versus national security: the method of the constitutional law (working paper) / I. Pellizzone. ((Intervento presentato al convegno Transatlantic Conference on Transparency Research (Second edition) tenutosi a Utrecht University - Nederland nel 2012.
Transparency versus national security: the method of the constitutional law (working paper)
I. PellizzonePrimo
2012
Abstract
SUMMARY - 1. Introduction: the conflict between national security and transparency – Part one 2. The Italian law about state secret - 2.1. The leading case of 1977: national security as a constitutional foundation, and limit of state secret - 2.2. The effects of resorting to state secret before the judicial power: an “almost total” barrier to the criminal suit - 2.3. Secrecy is not breached although the records it regards have already been disclosed - 2.4. The oversight of the Italian constitutional Court in respect to the political nature of secrecy - 2.4.1. Considerations on the limits of subversion of the constitutional order for the use of state secrets and on the requirement of justifying the secrecy order - 2.5. Final considerations – Part two 3. The United States’ system: state secrets privilege and oversight of the judicial power - 4. The viewpoint of the European Court of Human Rights - 4.1. Secrecy and human rights in the ECHR’S jurisprudence - 5. Conclusions -File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Pellizzone.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore)
Dimensione
347.45 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
347.45 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.