Anesthetized, apneic, mechanically ventilated rabbits were placed into a tilting plethysmograph that a rubber diaphragm, tightly fitting the animal's body just below the xiphoid process, separated into a rib cage and abdominal chamber. Expired volumes (ΔV) and abdominal pressure changes (ΔPab) were assessed in supine and upright posture during maximal rib cage (RCC) and/or abdominal compression (ABC) by pressurizing either or both chambers, and during maximal stimulations of abdominal muscles (ABS). With RCC, ΔV supine and upright amounted to 16±4.9 (mean±S.D.) and 20.9±7% of the vital capacity in supine posture (VCs) and to 75.8±14.5 and 44.8±13.9% of the expiratory reserve volume (ERV) in corresponding posture, ΔPab being negligible. With ABC, ΔV was 13.7±2 and 38.9±7.3% VCs and 68.4±14.8 and 84.4±10.5% ERV, respectively. Both ΔV and ΔPab were similar with ABC and ABS, independent of posture. If this applies also to RCC and expiratory rib cage muscle contraction, maximal expiratory effects of the latter (a) are larger in upright than supine posture; (b) contribute to ERV more in supine than upright posture; and (c) are similar to those caused by ABS in supine, but substantially smaller in upright posture.

Lung-deflating ability of rib cage and abdominal muscles in rabbits / E. D'Angelo, E. Prandi, E. D'Angelo, M. Pecchiari. - In: RESPIRATORY PHYSIOLOGY & NEUROBIOLOGY. - ISSN 1569-9048. - 135:1(2003 Apr 15), pp. 17-24. [10.1016/S1569-9048(03)00017-X]

Lung-deflating ability of rib cage and abdominal muscles in rabbits

E. D'Angelo
Primo
;
E. Prandi
Secondo
;
M. Pecchiari
Ultimo
2003

Abstract

Anesthetized, apneic, mechanically ventilated rabbits were placed into a tilting plethysmograph that a rubber diaphragm, tightly fitting the animal's body just below the xiphoid process, separated into a rib cage and abdominal chamber. Expired volumes (ΔV) and abdominal pressure changes (ΔPab) were assessed in supine and upright posture during maximal rib cage (RCC) and/or abdominal compression (ABC) by pressurizing either or both chambers, and during maximal stimulations of abdominal muscles (ABS). With RCC, ΔV supine and upright amounted to 16±4.9 (mean±S.D.) and 20.9±7% of the vital capacity in supine posture (VCs) and to 75.8±14.5 and 44.8±13.9% of the expiratory reserve volume (ERV) in corresponding posture, ΔPab being negligible. With ABC, ΔV was 13.7±2 and 38.9±7.3% VCs and 68.4±14.8 and 84.4±10.5% ERV, respectively. Both ΔV and ΔPab were similar with ABC and ABS, independent of posture. If this applies also to RCC and expiratory rib cage muscle contraction, maximal expiratory effects of the latter (a) are larger in upright than supine posture; (b) contribute to ERV more in supine than upright posture; and (c) are similar to those caused by ABS in supine, but substantially smaller in upright posture.
Mammals, rabbit; Mechanics of breathing, chest wall; Muscles, abdominal, thoracic; Posture, abdominal pressure; Pressure, abdominal, posture
Settore BIO/09 - Fisiologia
15-apr-2003
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
7136_Lung-deflating ability.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 262.31 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
262.31 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/20351
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact