Purpose: To evaluate and address the safety of verteb-roplasty (VP) and kyphoplasty (KP) in terms of rate and type of cement leakage in the treatment of Multiple Myeloma (MM) vertebral fractures. Methods: A total number of 37 treated vertebrae were evaluated post-operatively by using standard X-rays and CT scan looking for a cement leakage. VP was done using a monoportal approach in all cases (18 treated levels, group A), while KP was done using a monopedicular approach in 9 levels (group B1) and using a bipedicular approach in the remaining 10 levels (group B2). A computed tomography was used to establish the presence of any cement leakage and to determine its localization. Results: Vertebral augmentation through VP and KP provides immediate pain relief and an improvement of the quality of life of patients affected by MM but it is gravated by high risk of cement leakage. Cement extravasation occurred in 27.7% of total VP procedures and in 21.05% of total KP procedures, but considering the whole number of treated levels, it was more common in multi-level VP and in bipedicular KP, in which a higher quantity of cement was employed. Conclusions: KP procedure in these patients is slightly less risky but we suggest doing it with a monopedicular approach. It's mandatory to use an high viscosity cement and we suggest not to use an amount of PMMA over 2 cc and a previous treatment with bone marrow transplant is related to a lower risk of cement leakage.

Cement leakage : safety of minimally invasive surgical techniques in the treatment of multiple myeloma vertebral lesions / G.A. La Maida, L.S. Giarratana, A. Acerbi, V. Ferrari, G.V. Mineo, B. Misaggi. - In: EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL. - ISSN 0940-6719. - 21:suppl 1(2012 Mar), pp. 61-68. [10.1007/s00586-012-2221-3]

Cement leakage : safety of minimally invasive surgical techniques in the treatment of multiple myeloma vertebral lesions

G.V. Mineo
Penultimo
;
2012

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate and address the safety of verteb-roplasty (VP) and kyphoplasty (KP) in terms of rate and type of cement leakage in the treatment of Multiple Myeloma (MM) vertebral fractures. Methods: A total number of 37 treated vertebrae were evaluated post-operatively by using standard X-rays and CT scan looking for a cement leakage. VP was done using a monoportal approach in all cases (18 treated levels, group A), while KP was done using a monopedicular approach in 9 levels (group B1) and using a bipedicular approach in the remaining 10 levels (group B2). A computed tomography was used to establish the presence of any cement leakage and to determine its localization. Results: Vertebral augmentation through VP and KP provides immediate pain relief and an improvement of the quality of life of patients affected by MM but it is gravated by high risk of cement leakage. Cement extravasation occurred in 27.7% of total VP procedures and in 21.05% of total KP procedures, but considering the whole number of treated levels, it was more common in multi-level VP and in bipedicular KP, in which a higher quantity of cement was employed. Conclusions: KP procedure in these patients is slightly less risky but we suggest doing it with a monopedicular approach. It's mandatory to use an high viscosity cement and we suggest not to use an amount of PMMA over 2 cc and a previous treatment with bone marrow transplant is related to a lower risk of cement leakage.
Multiple Myeloma ; spine fracture ; vertebroplasty ; kyphoplasty
Settore MED/33 - Malattie Apparato Locomotore
mar-2012
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
CEMENT LACKAGE EUR SPINE 2012.pdf

accesso solo dalla rete interna

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 623.54 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
623.54 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/173858
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 9
  • Scopus 27
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 21
social impact