Plasma membrane disruptions are caused by excessive mechanical stress and thought to be involved in inflammatory mediator upregulation. Presently, plasma membrane disruption formation has been studied only during mechanical ventilation with large tidal volumes and limitedly to subpleural alveoli. No information is available concerning the distribution of plasma membrane disruptions within the lung or the development of plasma membrane disruptions during another modality of injurious mechanical ventilation, i.e., mechanical ventilation with eupneic tidal volume (7 mL[middle dot]kg-1) at low end-expiratory lung volume. The aim of this study is to assess whether 1) mechanical ventilation with eupneic tidal volume at low end-expiratory lung volume causes plasma membrane disruptions; and 2) the distribution of plasma membrane disruptions differs from that of mechanical ventilation with large tidal volume at normal end-expiratory lung volume. Design: Experimental animal model. Subjects: Sprague-Dawley rats. Interventions: Plasma membrane disruptions have been detected as red spots in gelatin-included slices of rat lungs stained with ethidium homodimer-1 shortly after anesthesia (control) after prolonged mechanical ventilation with eupneic tidal volume at low end-expiratory lung volume followed or not by the restoration of physiological end-expiratory lung volume and after prolonged mechanical ventilation with large tidal volumes and normal end-expiratory lung volume. Measurements and Main Results: Plasma membrane disruptions increased during mechanical ventilation at low end-expiratory lung volume, mainly at the bronchiolar level. Resealing of most plasma membrane disruptions occurred on restoration of normal end-expiratory lung volume. Mechanical ventilation with large tidal volume caused the appearance of plasma membrane disruptions, both bronchiolar and parenchymal, the latter to a much greater extent than with mechanical ventilation at low end-expiratory lung volume. The increase of plasma membrane disruptions correlated with the concomitant increase of airway resistance with both modes of mechanical ventilation. Conclusions: Amount and distribution of plasma membrane disruptions between small airways and lung parenchyma depends on the type of injurious mechanical ventilation. This could be relevant to the release of inflammatory mediators.

Plasma membrane disruptions with different modes of injurious mechanical ventilation in normal rat lungs / M. Pecchiari, A. Monaco, A. Koutsoukou, E. D'Angelo. - In: CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE. - ISSN 0090-3493. - 40:3(2012), pp. 869-875. [10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232da2b]

Plasma membrane disruptions with different modes of injurious mechanical ventilation in normal rat lungs

M. Pecchiari
Primo
;
A. Monaco
Secondo
;
E. D'Angelo
Ultimo
2012

Abstract

Plasma membrane disruptions are caused by excessive mechanical stress and thought to be involved in inflammatory mediator upregulation. Presently, plasma membrane disruption formation has been studied only during mechanical ventilation with large tidal volumes and limitedly to subpleural alveoli. No information is available concerning the distribution of plasma membrane disruptions within the lung or the development of plasma membrane disruptions during another modality of injurious mechanical ventilation, i.e., mechanical ventilation with eupneic tidal volume (7 mL[middle dot]kg-1) at low end-expiratory lung volume. The aim of this study is to assess whether 1) mechanical ventilation with eupneic tidal volume at low end-expiratory lung volume causes plasma membrane disruptions; and 2) the distribution of plasma membrane disruptions differs from that of mechanical ventilation with large tidal volume at normal end-expiratory lung volume. Design: Experimental animal model. Subjects: Sprague-Dawley rats. Interventions: Plasma membrane disruptions have been detected as red spots in gelatin-included slices of rat lungs stained with ethidium homodimer-1 shortly after anesthesia (control) after prolonged mechanical ventilation with eupneic tidal volume at low end-expiratory lung volume followed or not by the restoration of physiological end-expiratory lung volume and after prolonged mechanical ventilation with large tidal volumes and normal end-expiratory lung volume. Measurements and Main Results: Plasma membrane disruptions increased during mechanical ventilation at low end-expiratory lung volume, mainly at the bronchiolar level. Resealing of most plasma membrane disruptions occurred on restoration of normal end-expiratory lung volume. Mechanical ventilation with large tidal volume caused the appearance of plasma membrane disruptions, both bronchiolar and parenchymal, the latter to a much greater extent than with mechanical ventilation at low end-expiratory lung volume. The increase of plasma membrane disruptions correlated with the concomitant increase of airway resistance with both modes of mechanical ventilation. Conclusions: Amount and distribution of plasma membrane disruptions between small airways and lung parenchyma depends on the type of injurious mechanical ventilation. This could be relevant to the release of inflammatory mediators.
airway resistance; cell membrane; mechanical; respiratory mechanics; stress; ventilator-induced lung injury
Settore BIO/09 - Fisiologia
2012
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Plasma membrane disruptions.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 856.28 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
856.28 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
169619PP_Plasma membrane.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Post-print, accepted manuscript ecc. (versione accettata dall'editore)
Dimensione 1.09 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.09 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/169619
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact