Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been proposed as a non-invasive neuromodulatory strategy to enhance motor performance and modulate inflammatory responses. However, its effects on strength capacity and physiological stress markers during complex resistance exercises in elite athletes remain underexplored. Methods: In this exploratory, randomized, sham-controlled pilot study, ten elite male weightlifters (n = 10; active tDCS = 5, sham = 5) received either a single 20-min session of anodal tDCS (2 mA) over the motor cortex or sham stimulation immediately before performing high-load back squats (85% 1RM). Outcomes included repetition number, barbell kinematics, Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (Borg-RPE), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) measures, and metabolic and oxy-inflammatory biomarkers (blood glucose, lactate, antioxidant capacity; salivary ROS; urinary IL-6, 8-iso-PGF2α, 8-OH-dG, creatinine, and neopterin). Given the exploratory design and small sample size, intervention effects were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U tests. For outcomes assessed both before and after stimulation, between-group comparisons were performed on change scores (Δ = post - pre). In contrast, mechanical exercise-related variables, which were only collected after stimulation, were directly compared between the active and sham groups. Results: Athletes receiving active tDCS performed a significantly higher number of back squat repetitions and exhibited shorter lift times compared with the sham group (p = 0.024 and p = 0.011, respectively). No significant between-group differences were observed in Borg-RPE, VAS-based subjective measures, or biochemical markers (all p > 0.05). No significant differences were found for the remaining mechanical parameters (all p > 0.05). Conclusions: A single session of anodal tDCS applied before high-load back squat exercise may be associated with improvements in repetition capacity and lifting efficiency in elite weightlifters. No significant effects were observed on perceived exertion, biomechanical stability measures, or metabolic, oxidative, inflammatory, and renal biomarkers. These preliminary findings suggest that tDCS may represent a promising neuromodulatory adjunct to strength training, warranting confirmation in larger and methodologically powered studies. Trial registration: None (pilot study).

Pushing athletic performance boundaries with anodal transcranial direct current stimulation: an exploratory, pilot, randomized controlled study on strength and inflammation in elite weightlifters / R. De Donato, M.P.. - In: BMC SPORTS SCIENCE, MEDICINE & REHABILITATION. - ISSN 2052-1847. - (2026 Jun 12). [Epub ahead of print] [10.1186/s13102-026-01803-9]

Pushing athletic performance boundaries with anodal transcranial direct current stimulation: an exploratory, pilot, randomized controlled study on strength and inflammation in elite weightlifters

M. Guidetti;R. Ferrucci;A. Priori;S. Marceglia
Penultimo
;
S. Mrakic-Sposta
Ultimo
2026

Abstract

Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been proposed as a non-invasive neuromodulatory strategy to enhance motor performance and modulate inflammatory responses. However, its effects on strength capacity and physiological stress markers during complex resistance exercises in elite athletes remain underexplored. Methods: In this exploratory, randomized, sham-controlled pilot study, ten elite male weightlifters (n = 10; active tDCS = 5, sham = 5) received either a single 20-min session of anodal tDCS (2 mA) over the motor cortex or sham stimulation immediately before performing high-load back squats (85% 1RM). Outcomes included repetition number, barbell kinematics, Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (Borg-RPE), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) measures, and metabolic and oxy-inflammatory biomarkers (blood glucose, lactate, antioxidant capacity; salivary ROS; urinary IL-6, 8-iso-PGF2α, 8-OH-dG, creatinine, and neopterin). Given the exploratory design and small sample size, intervention effects were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U tests. For outcomes assessed both before and after stimulation, between-group comparisons were performed on change scores (Δ = post - pre). In contrast, mechanical exercise-related variables, which were only collected after stimulation, were directly compared between the active and sham groups. Results: Athletes receiving active tDCS performed a significantly higher number of back squat repetitions and exhibited shorter lift times compared with the sham group (p = 0.024 and p = 0.011, respectively). No significant between-group differences were observed in Borg-RPE, VAS-based subjective measures, or biochemical markers (all p > 0.05). No significant differences were found for the remaining mechanical parameters (all p > 0.05). Conclusions: A single session of anodal tDCS applied before high-load back squat exercise may be associated with improvements in repetition capacity and lifting efficiency in elite weightlifters. No significant effects were observed on perceived exertion, biomechanical stability measures, or metabolic, oxidative, inflammatory, and renal biomarkers. These preliminary findings suggest that tDCS may represent a promising neuromodulatory adjunct to strength training, warranting confirmation in larger and methodologically powered studies. Trial registration: None (pilot study).
non-invasive brain stimulation; oxidative stress; inflammation; transcranial direct current stimulation; back squat; athletes; strength and conditioning
Settore MEDS-12/A - Neurologia
Settore MEDS-26/C - Scienze delle professioni sanitarie della riabilitazione
12-giu-2026
12-giu-2026
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s13102-026-01803-9_reference.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.48 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.48 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1257395
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact