paper examines how contemporary criminal law addresses the rising complexity of transna-tional and macro-criminality, focusing on the interaction between digital evidence, cross-border cooperation, and the legal characterisation of offences. As organised criminal networks and atroc-ity crimes increasingly unfold across multiple jurisdictions and rely on digital technologies, in-vestigative and prosecutorial practices have undergone notable change. Yet these developments have not always translated into stronger accountability. Using crimes committed against mi-grants and refugees in Libya and along the Central Mediterranean route as a case study, the paper analyses how abuses are documented, investigated, and prosecuted across domestic, regional, and international fora. It first considers the growing reliance on digital and open-source evidence and assesses both its potential for establishing broader patterns of criminality and the challenges it poses for authentication, preservation, and admissibility. The paper then examines evolving coop-eration mechanisms, including Joint Investigation Teams and Joint Teams, which merge ap-proaches traditionally associated with transnational organised crime with those of international criminal law. While these tools have facilitated arrests and improved information-sharing, their effectiveness remains tied to domestic legal frameworks and jurisdictional constraints. Finally, the paper identifies a persistent gap between investigative progress and prosecutorial outcomes. Na-tional authorities continue to pursue migration-related offences more readily than trafficking or crimes against humanity, even where evidence reflects organised and systematic patterns of abuse. The paper concludes that meaningful accountability requires aligning investigative innovation with the domestic application of international crimes, supported by robust evidentiary methods and sustained cross-border cooperation.
Prosecuting transnational (and macro-) crimes: digital evidence, judicial cooperation, and fair labelling across borders / M. Crippa. - In: REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE DROIT PENAL. - ISSN 0223-5404. - 2025:2(2026 May 18), pp. 273-292.
Prosecuting transnational (and macro-) crimes: digital evidence, judicial cooperation, and fair labelling across borders
M. Crippa
2026
Abstract
paper examines how contemporary criminal law addresses the rising complexity of transna-tional and macro-criminality, focusing on the interaction between digital evidence, cross-border cooperation, and the legal characterisation of offences. As organised criminal networks and atroc-ity crimes increasingly unfold across multiple jurisdictions and rely on digital technologies, in-vestigative and prosecutorial practices have undergone notable change. Yet these developments have not always translated into stronger accountability. Using crimes committed against mi-grants and refugees in Libya and along the Central Mediterranean route as a case study, the paper analyses how abuses are documented, investigated, and prosecuted across domestic, regional, and international fora. It first considers the growing reliance on digital and open-source evidence and assesses both its potential for establishing broader patterns of criminality and the challenges it poses for authentication, preservation, and admissibility. The paper then examines evolving coop-eration mechanisms, including Joint Investigation Teams and Joint Teams, which merge ap-proaches traditionally associated with transnational organised crime with those of international criminal law. While these tools have facilitated arrests and improved information-sharing, their effectiveness remains tied to domestic legal frameworks and jurisdictional constraints. Finally, the paper identifies a persistent gap between investigative progress and prosecutorial outcomes. Na-tional authorities continue to pursue migration-related offences more readily than trafficking or crimes against humanity, even where evidence reflects organised and systematic patterns of abuse. The paper concludes that meaningful accountability requires aligning investigative innovation with the domestic application of international crimes, supported by robust evidentiary methods and sustained cross-border cooperation.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Birritteri_Gibson_Marko (Eds.)_RIDP_2_ 2025-274-293.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza:
Nessuna licenza
Dimensione
523.39 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
523.39 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




