EFSA was requested by the European Commission to provide a scientific opinion on new developments in biotechnology, including new genomic techniques, as applied to animals for food, feed and other agricultural uses. A horizon-scanning exercise identified a variety of animals obtained with new genomic techniques, with the potential to reach the EU market in the short, medium and long term. No novel hazards have been identified that are linked to either the modification process or the newly introduced trait, when SDN-1, SDN-2 and comparable techniques (e.g. base editing or prime editing) were compared to established genomic techniques (EGTs) or conventional breeding. Hazards posed by SDN-3 are of the same nature as those posed by EGTs and the targeted insertion may reduce the potential hazards associated with the disruption of endogenous genes and/or regulatory elements in the recipient genome. Hazards posed by the new trait resulting from the introduced transgenic or intragenic DNA sequence are of the same nature as those posed by EGTs. Hazards posed by the new trait resulting from the introduced cisgenic DNA sequence are of the same nature as those posed by conventional breeding. Off-target mutations from genome editing are similar in nature to those from conventional breeding and do not pose novel hazards. Consequently, based on the currently available data, no new potential hazards, and thus, no new risks to humans, animals or the environment have been identified. A thorough evaluation of existing EFSA guidance documents for the risk assessment of GM animals revealed that their principles and recommendations provide the basis for assessing the risks of new genomic technique (NGT) animals for food, feed and other agricultural uses; however, the current texts cover only partially some areas (e.g. animal health and welfare) and may need updates, adaptations or enhancements on a case-by-case basis to fully address NGT-related risks.

New developments in biotechnology applied to animals: An assessment of the adequacy and sufficiency of current EFSA guidance for animal risk assessment / J. Casacuberta, F. Barro, A. Braeuning, R. De Maagd, M.M. Epstein, T. Frenzel, J. Gallois, F. Koning, A. Messéan, F.J. Moreno, F. Nogué, A.H. Schulman, C. Tebbe, E. Veromann, L. Firbank, D. Glandorf, M.S. Herskin, S.G. Lillico, R. Ornsrud, A. Troedsson‐wargelius, M. Ardizzone, P. Lenzi, A. M. Camargo, N. Papadopoulou, R. Schoonjans, M. Vitali, G. Savoini. - In: EFSA JOURNAL. - ISSN 1831-4732. - 23:8(2025 Aug), pp. e9566.1-e9566.63. [10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9566]

New developments in biotechnology applied to animals: An assessment of the adequacy and sufficiency of current EFSA guidance for animal risk assessment

G. Savoini
2025

Abstract

EFSA was requested by the European Commission to provide a scientific opinion on new developments in biotechnology, including new genomic techniques, as applied to animals for food, feed and other agricultural uses. A horizon-scanning exercise identified a variety of animals obtained with new genomic techniques, with the potential to reach the EU market in the short, medium and long term. No novel hazards have been identified that are linked to either the modification process or the newly introduced trait, when SDN-1, SDN-2 and comparable techniques (e.g. base editing or prime editing) were compared to established genomic techniques (EGTs) or conventional breeding. Hazards posed by SDN-3 are of the same nature as those posed by EGTs and the targeted insertion may reduce the potential hazards associated with the disruption of endogenous genes and/or regulatory elements in the recipient genome. Hazards posed by the new trait resulting from the introduced transgenic or intragenic DNA sequence are of the same nature as those posed by EGTs. Hazards posed by the new trait resulting from the introduced cisgenic DNA sequence are of the same nature as those posed by conventional breeding. Off-target mutations from genome editing are similar in nature to those from conventional breeding and do not pose novel hazards. Consequently, based on the currently available data, no new potential hazards, and thus, no new risks to humans, animals or the environment have been identified. A thorough evaluation of existing EFSA guidance documents for the risk assessment of GM animals revealed that their principles and recommendations provide the basis for assessing the risks of new genomic technique (NGT) animals for food, feed and other agricultural uses; however, the current texts cover only partially some areas (e.g. animal health and welfare) and may need updates, adaptations or enhancements on a case-by-case basis to fully address NGT-related risks.
animal health and welfare; conventional breeding; established genomic techniques; genetically modified animals; hazard; new genomic techniques; risk; risk assessment; synthetic biology;
Settore AGRI-09/B - Nutrizione e alimentazione animale
ago-2025
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
EFSA Journal 2025.9566.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 22.96 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
22.96 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1217935
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
  • OpenAlex 4
social impact