Objective: This study was undertaken to assess the effectiveness/tolerability of adjunctive cenobamate, variations in the load of concomitant antiseizure medications (ASMs) and predictors of clinical response in people with focal epilepsy. Methods: This was a retrospective study at 21 centers participating in the Italian Expanded Access Program. Effectiveness outcomes included retention and responder rates (≥50% and 100% reduction in baseline seizure frequency). Tolerability/safety outcomes included the rate of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) and their incidence. Total drug load was quantified as the number of concomitant ASMs and total defined daily dose (DDD). Concomitant ASMs were also classified according to their mechanism of action and pharmacokinetic interactions to perform explorative subgroup analyses. Results: A total of 236 subjects with a median age of 38 (Q1–Q3 = 27–49) years were included. At 12 months, cenobamate retention rate was 78.8% and responders were 57.5%. The seizure freedom rates during the preceding 3 months were 9.8%, 12.2%, 16.3%, and 14.0% at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. A higher percentage of responders was observed among subjects treated with clobazam, although the difference was not statistically significant. A total of 223 AEs were recorded in 133 of 236 participants, leading to cenobamate discontinuation in 8.5% cases. At 12 months, a reduction of one or two concomitant ASMs occurred in 42.6% and 4.3% of the subjects. The median total DDD of all concomitant ASMs decreased from 3.34 (Q1–Q3 = 2.50–4.47) at baseline to 2.50 (Q1–Q3 = 1.67–3.50) at 12 months (p <.001, median percentage reduction = 22.2%). The highest rates of cotreatment withdrawal and reductions in the DDD were observed for sodium channel blockers and γ-aminobutyric acidergic modulators (above all for those linked to pharmacokinetic interactions), and perampanel. Significance: Adjunctive cenobamate was associated with a reduction in seizure frequency and in the burden of concomitant ASMs in adults with difficult-to-treat focal epilepsy. The type of ASM associated did not influence effectiveness except for a favorable trend with clobazam.

Adjunctive cenobamate in people with focal onset seizures: Insights from the Italian Expanded Access Program / R. Roberta, A. Giovanni, B. Francesca, B. Giovanni, C. Laura, V. Chiesa, Di , B. Carlo, Di , G. Giancarlo, E. Maurizio, F. Edoardo, G. Alfonso, La , N. Angela, L. Claudio, M. Stefano, Operto Francesca Felicia, P. Nicola, P. Monica, P. Patrizia, R. Eleonora, S. Ilaria, T. Elena, V. Giampaolo, V. Flavio, R. Emilio, L. Simona, Cenobamate Expanded Access Program Italy Study Group: Sabina Bartalini, C. Calabrese, Emanuele Cerulli Irelli, R. Coa, A. D'Aniello, G. Didato, C. Calabrese, G. Falcicchio, M. Fernandes, F. Fortunato, R. Frangiosa, D. Lomonaco, R. Matrullo, E. Micalizzi, A. Morano, L. Muccioli, C. Panzini, A. Pascarella, Pier Paolo Quarato, E. Ricci, L. Salimbene, M. Tombini, Anna Elisabetta Vaudano. - In: EPILEPSIA. - ISSN 0013-9580. - 65:10(2024 Oct), pp. 2909-2922. [10.1111/epi.18091]

Adjunctive cenobamate in people with focal onset seizures: Insights from the Italian Expanded Access Program

V. Chiesa;F. Fortunato;E. Ricci;
2024

Abstract

Objective: This study was undertaken to assess the effectiveness/tolerability of adjunctive cenobamate, variations in the load of concomitant antiseizure medications (ASMs) and predictors of clinical response in people with focal epilepsy. Methods: This was a retrospective study at 21 centers participating in the Italian Expanded Access Program. Effectiveness outcomes included retention and responder rates (≥50% and 100% reduction in baseline seizure frequency). Tolerability/safety outcomes included the rate of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) and their incidence. Total drug load was quantified as the number of concomitant ASMs and total defined daily dose (DDD). Concomitant ASMs were also classified according to their mechanism of action and pharmacokinetic interactions to perform explorative subgroup analyses. Results: A total of 236 subjects with a median age of 38 (Q1–Q3 = 27–49) years were included. At 12 months, cenobamate retention rate was 78.8% and responders were 57.5%. The seizure freedom rates during the preceding 3 months were 9.8%, 12.2%, 16.3%, and 14.0% at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. A higher percentage of responders was observed among subjects treated with clobazam, although the difference was not statistically significant. A total of 223 AEs were recorded in 133 of 236 participants, leading to cenobamate discontinuation in 8.5% cases. At 12 months, a reduction of one or two concomitant ASMs occurred in 42.6% and 4.3% of the subjects. The median total DDD of all concomitant ASMs decreased from 3.34 (Q1–Q3 = 2.50–4.47) at baseline to 2.50 (Q1–Q3 = 1.67–3.50) at 12 months (p <.001, median percentage reduction = 22.2%). The highest rates of cotreatment withdrawal and reductions in the DDD were observed for sodium channel blockers and γ-aminobutyric acidergic modulators (above all for those linked to pharmacokinetic interactions), and perampanel. Significance: Adjunctive cenobamate was associated with a reduction in seizure frequency and in the burden of concomitant ASMs in adults with difficult-to-treat focal epilepsy. The type of ASM associated did not influence effectiveness except for a favorable trend with clobazam.
antiseizure medication; cenobamate; clobazam; drug daily dose; epilepsy; focal seizures
Settore MEDS-20/B - Neuropsichiatria infantile
ott-2024
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Epilepsia - 2024 - Roberti - Adjunctive cenobamate in people with focal onset seizures Insights from the Italian Expanded.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 3.07 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.07 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1192562
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
  • OpenAlex 16
social impact