Proprietary Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown tendencies toward politeness, formality, and implicit content moderation. While previous research has primarily focused on explicitly training models to moderate and detoxify sensitive content, there has been limited exploration of whether LLMs implicitly sanitize language without explicit instructions. This study empirically analyzes the implicit moderation behavior of GPT-4o-mini when paraphrasing sensitive content and evaluates the extent of sensitivity shifts. Our experiments indicate that GPT-4o-mini systematically moderates content toward less sensitive classes, with substantial reductions in derogatory and taboo language. Also, we evaluate the zero-shot capabilities of LLMs in classifying sentence sensitivity, comparing their performances against traditional methods.
What's Taboo for You? : An Empirical Evaluation of LLMs Behavior Toward Sensitive Content / A. Ferrara, S. Picascia, L. Pinnavaia, V. Ranitovic, E. Rocchetti, A. Tuveri. - (2025 Jul 31). [10.48550/arXiv.2507.23319]
What's Taboo for You? : An Empirical Evaluation of LLMs Behavior Toward Sensitive Content
A. FerraraPrimo
;S. PicasciaSecondo
;L. Pinnavaia;V. Ranitovic;E. RocchettiPenultimo
;
2025
Abstract
Proprietary Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown tendencies toward politeness, formality, and implicit content moderation. While previous research has primarily focused on explicitly training models to moderate and detoxify sensitive content, there has been limited exploration of whether LLMs implicitly sanitize language without explicit instructions. This study empirically analyzes the implicit moderation behavior of GPT-4o-mini when paraphrasing sensitive content and evaluates the extent of sensitivity shifts. Our experiments indicate that GPT-4o-mini systematically moderates content toward less sensitive classes, with substantial reductions in derogatory and taboo language. Also, we evaluate the zero-shot capabilities of LLMs in classifying sentence sensitivity, comparing their performances against traditional methods.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2507.23319v1.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
762.03 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
762.03 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




