Background and ContextThis study investigates how third-grade Italian students (aged 8) learn definite ('repeat n times') iteration, using either a puzzle-based or Use-Modify-Create (UMC) instructional approach, both delivered on the Code.org Studio platform.ObjectiveTo verify the effectiveness of these approaches in teaching definite iteration, capturing any differences in students'performance and learning experience.MethodA quasi-experimental study (93 teachers, 1434 students), with pre- and post-intervention assessments, and a learning intervention of 4 one-hour lessons, directly delivered by teachers.FindingsBoth approaches proved successful. Students who experienced the puzzle-based approach performed slightly better. The UMC approach proved nearly as effective, earning slight preference by participants.ImplicationsBoth approaches proved suitable for early primary education. This work helps frame the puzzle-based approach as a teaching method, and provides tested instructional materials grounded in the UMC approach, adapted to the Code.org Studio environment.
Puzzle-based vs UMC approaches for learning iteration in grade 3 / S. Capecchi, L. Forlizzi, I. Fronza, M. Lodi, V. Lonati, G. Melideo, M. Monga, E. Nardelli, V. Rossano, T. Vardanega. - In: COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION. - ISSN 0899-3408. - (2025), pp. 1-44. [Epub ahead of print] [10.1080/08993408.2025.2542669]
Puzzle-based vs UMC approaches for learning iteration in grade 3
V. Lonati;M. Monga;
2025
Abstract
Background and ContextThis study investigates how third-grade Italian students (aged 8) learn definite ('repeat n times') iteration, using either a puzzle-based or Use-Modify-Create (UMC) instructional approach, both delivered on the Code.org Studio platform.ObjectiveTo verify the effectiveness of these approaches in teaching definite iteration, capturing any differences in students'performance and learning experience.MethodA quasi-experimental study (93 teachers, 1434 students), with pre- and post-intervention assessments, and a learning intervention of 4 one-hour lessons, directly delivered by teachers.FindingsBoth approaches proved successful. Students who experienced the puzzle-based approach performed slightly better. The UMC approach proved nearly as effective, earning slight preference by participants.ImplicationsBoth approaches proved suitable for early primary education. This work helps frame the puzzle-based approach as a teaching method, and provides tested instructional materials grounded in the UMC approach, adapted to the Code.org Studio environment.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
02DopoFase2.pdf
embargo fino al 19/12/2026
Tipologia:
Post-print, accepted manuscript ecc. (versione accettata dall'editore)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.4 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.4 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




