The article discusses the status quo of the Istanbul Convention in the context of the Council of Europe. The investigation delves into three areas: The first deals with the lack of an intersectional approach underpinning the text and approach of the Convention; the second covers the effectiveness of the Convention, by examining the Council of Europe’s member states’ responses in terms of signatures, ratifications, reservations, and withdrawals; lastly, the article investigates the European Court of Human Rights’ case-law to test whether and to what extent the ECtHR is acting like a supplementary judicial treaty body, ensuring the implementation of the Convention.
The Istanbul Convention: yes and nos / C. Nardocci. - In: ERA-FORUM. - ISSN 1612-3093. - 26:(2025), pp. 126-147. [10.1007/s12027-025-00831-1]
The Istanbul Convention: yes and nos
C. Nardocci
2025
Abstract
The article discusses the status quo of the Istanbul Convention in the context of the Council of Europe. The investigation delves into three areas: The first deals with the lack of an intersectional approach underpinning the text and approach of the Convention; the second covers the effectiveness of the Convention, by examining the Council of Europe’s member states’ responses in terms of signatures, ratifications, reservations, and withdrawals; lastly, the article investigates the European Court of Human Rights’ case-law to test whether and to what extent the ECtHR is acting like a supplementary judicial treaty body, ensuring the implementation of the Convention.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
unpaywall-bitstream-967247375.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
950.69 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
950.69 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




