OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive thymectomy is an accepted approach for early-stage thymic epithelial neoplasia, reducing pain and length of stay compared with open surgery. In this study, we compare robotic and video-assisted thymectomy to assess pathological resection status, overall and disease-free survival. METHODS: Data were retrieved from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons prospectively maintained thymic database. Eighty-two international centres were invited to participate in the ESTS registry. Thirty-seven centres agreed to take part. We included all patients who had undergone complete thymectomy for malignancy through a minimally invasive approach and excluded patients in whom complete data were not available. RESULTS: Between October 2001 and May 2021, a total of 899 patients with thymic malignancy underwent minimal access surgical resection and were included in the study. A propensity matched analysis was conducted with interrogation of 732 patients. Median age was 55 years, and 408 (56%) patients were female. Propensity matched was performed with 1:1 matching for surgical approach (video assisted = 366, robot assisted = 366). Robot-assisted surgery conferred significantly lower odds of incomplete resection (R1; 0.203 95% CI 0.13-0.317; P < 0.001). However, there was no difference in terms of overall and disease-free survival between the 2 techniques. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, after adjusting for thymoma stage, the odds of incomplete surgical resection were higher in patients undergoing video-assisted surgery than robotic. However, there was no difference in overall or disease-free survival. With data maturation and increased follow-up, this would need repeat analysis and perhaps may provide more credence to the concept of a prospective randomized study to compare outcomes in thymic epithelial neoplasia by surgical approach with a standardized pathological work-up.

Robotic-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for thymic epithelial tumours, from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database / A.J. Patel, A. Smith, N. Null, A. Podobed, M. Liberman, T. Pascal, P. Gabryel, C. Aigner, G. Aresu, A. Coonar, M. Nizami, M. Jimenez, P. Van Schil, L. Voltolini, M. Casiraghi, L. Spaggiari, L. Ampollini, S. Carmargo, F. Londero, I. Schmitt-Opitz, M. Scarci, A. Turna, M. Esch, F. Venuta, P. Mendogni, N. Moreno-Mata, F. Martelo, H. Elkhayat, G. Fitzmaurice, Z. Szanto, B. Moser, P. Lyberis, E. Ruffini, A. Bille. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY. - ISSN 1873-734X. - 66:4(2024), pp. ezae346.1-ezae346.9. [10.1093/ejcts/ezae346]

Robotic-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for thymic epithelial tumours, from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database

M. Casiraghi;L. Spaggiari;P. Mendogni;A. Bille
Ultimo
2024

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive thymectomy is an accepted approach for early-stage thymic epithelial neoplasia, reducing pain and length of stay compared with open surgery. In this study, we compare robotic and video-assisted thymectomy to assess pathological resection status, overall and disease-free survival. METHODS: Data were retrieved from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons prospectively maintained thymic database. Eighty-two international centres were invited to participate in the ESTS registry. Thirty-seven centres agreed to take part. We included all patients who had undergone complete thymectomy for malignancy through a minimally invasive approach and excluded patients in whom complete data were not available. RESULTS: Between October 2001 and May 2021, a total of 899 patients with thymic malignancy underwent minimal access surgical resection and were included in the study. A propensity matched analysis was conducted with interrogation of 732 patients. Median age was 55 years, and 408 (56%) patients were female. Propensity matched was performed with 1:1 matching for surgical approach (video assisted = 366, robot assisted = 366). Robot-assisted surgery conferred significantly lower odds of incomplete resection (R1; 0.203 95% CI 0.13-0.317; P < 0.001). However, there was no difference in terms of overall and disease-free survival between the 2 techniques. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, after adjusting for thymoma stage, the odds of incomplete surgical resection were higher in patients undergoing video-assisted surgery than robotic. However, there was no difference in overall or disease-free survival. With data maturation and increased follow-up, this would need repeat analysis and perhaps may provide more credence to the concept of a prospective randomized study to compare outcomes in thymic epithelial neoplasia by surgical approach with a standardized pathological work-up.
Minimally invasive surgery; Robot-assisted thoracic surgery; Survival; Thymectomy; Thymoma; Video-assisted thoracic surgery
Settore MEDS-13/A - Chirurgia toracica
2024
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
EJCTS 2024 1.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Nessuna licenza
Dimensione 1.24 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.24 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1156519
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact