Aim: To explore patients’ follow-up preferences. Background: Optimal follow-up strategies for patients with coeliac disease remain a subject of debate. Research suggests patients’ prefer review by dietitians with a doctor available as required. Methods: Patients with coeliac disease under review at our centre, completed a questionnaire assessing their views on what makes follow-up useful based on specific criteria. Bloods tests, symptoms review, dietary assessment, opportunity to ask questions and reassurance. Patients’ preferences between follow-up with a hospital doctor, a hospital dietitian, a hospital dietitian with a doctor available, a general practitioner, no follow-up or access when needed were also evaluated. Results: 138 adult patients completed the questionnaire, 80% of patients reported following a strict gluten free diet (mean diagnosis was 7.2 years). Overall, 60% found their follow-up to be ‘very useful’ valuing their review of blood tests and symptoms (71%) reassurance (60%) and opportunity to ask questions (58%). Follow-up by a dietitian with a doctor available was the most preferred option of review (p<0.001) except when compared to hospital doctor (p=0.75). Novel modalities of follow-up such as telephone and video reviews were regarded as of equal value to face-to-face appointments (65% and 62% respectively). Digital applications were significantly less preferable (38%, p<0.001). Conclusion: Follow-up by a dietitian with a doctor available as needed was the most preferred follow-up method. However, in this study follow-up by a dietitian with doctor available and hospital doctor alone was statistically equivalent. Many patients consider telephone and video follow-up of equal value to face-to-face reviews.

Long-term follow-up in patients with coeliac disease in the pandemic-era: A view from Sheffield the NHS England national centre for adult coeliac disease / N. Trott, S.A. Raju, A. Rej, O. Hoffman, W. Holland, J.R. Bebb, L. Seamark, M. Williams, C. Costas Batlle, Y.M. Jeanes, L. Elli, D.S. Sanders. - In: GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY FROM BED TO BENCH. - ISSN 2008-2258. - 16:2(2023), pp. 158-166. [10.22037/ghfbb.v16i2.2637]

Long-term follow-up in patients with coeliac disease in the pandemic-era: A view from Sheffield the NHS England national centre for adult coeliac disease

L. Elli;
2023

Abstract

Aim: To explore patients’ follow-up preferences. Background: Optimal follow-up strategies for patients with coeliac disease remain a subject of debate. Research suggests patients’ prefer review by dietitians with a doctor available as required. Methods: Patients with coeliac disease under review at our centre, completed a questionnaire assessing their views on what makes follow-up useful based on specific criteria. Bloods tests, symptoms review, dietary assessment, opportunity to ask questions and reassurance. Patients’ preferences between follow-up with a hospital doctor, a hospital dietitian, a hospital dietitian with a doctor available, a general practitioner, no follow-up or access when needed were also evaluated. Results: 138 adult patients completed the questionnaire, 80% of patients reported following a strict gluten free diet (mean diagnosis was 7.2 years). Overall, 60% found their follow-up to be ‘very useful’ valuing their review of blood tests and symptoms (71%) reassurance (60%) and opportunity to ask questions (58%). Follow-up by a dietitian with a doctor available was the most preferred option of review (p<0.001) except when compared to hospital doctor (p=0.75). Novel modalities of follow-up such as telephone and video reviews were regarded as of equal value to face-to-face appointments (65% and 62% respectively). Digital applications were significantly less preferable (38%, p<0.001). Conclusion: Follow-up by a dietitian with a doctor available as needed was the most preferred follow-up method. However, in this study follow-up by a dietitian with doctor available and hospital doctor alone was statistically equivalent. Many patients consider telephone and video follow-up of equal value to face-to-face reviews.
Celiac disease; Follow up; Gluten-free diet
Settore MEDS-10/A - Gastroenterologia
2023
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
GHFBB-16-2-158.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 412.61 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
412.61 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1145437
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact